Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29131 - 29140 of 30191 for de.
Search results 29131 - 29140 of 30191 for de.
State v. Jay D. Krajewski
Constitution. This is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d at 533. III
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17577 - 2005-03-31
Constitution. This is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d at 533. III
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17577 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
interpretation, our review is de novo. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶6, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d 273
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56880 - 2010-11-16
interpretation, our review is de novo. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶6, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d 273
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56880 - 2010-11-16
Frontsheet
that we review de novo. State v. Zarnke, 224 Wis. 2d 116, 124, 589 N.W.2d 370 (1999). A presumption
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36898 - 2009-06-22
that we review de novo. State v. Zarnke, 224 Wis. 2d 116, 124, 589 N.W.2d 370 (1999). A presumption
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36898 - 2009-06-22
[PDF]
WI App 33
that is subject to de novo review, on certiorari review we defer to the County Board’s “interpretation of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939224 - 2025-06-17
that is subject to de novo review, on certiorari review we defer to the County Board’s “interpretation of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939224 - 2025-06-17
[PDF]
State v. Timothy Scott Bailey Smith, Sr.
determination of the statutory elements of a crime is a question of law, our review is de novo. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18884 - 2017-09-21
determination of the statutory elements of a crime is a question of law, our review is de novo. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18884 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury’s answer to, Question 1. These arguments present a question of law for de novo review. See Dalka v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96892 - 2013-05-15
the jury’s answer to, Question 1. These arguments present a question of law for de novo review. See Dalka v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96892 - 2013-05-15
State v. George A. Faucher
the circuit court's determination de novo in Broomfield, 223 Wis. 2d at 480, but viewed the question as one
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17304 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court's determination de novo in Broomfield, 223 Wis. 2d at 480, but viewed the question as one
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17304 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven V. v. Kelley H.
This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Elizabeth W., 189 Wis. 2d at 435-36. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5816 - 2017-09-19
This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Elizabeth W., 189 Wis. 2d at 435-36. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5816 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steiney J. Richards
: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU JUSTICES
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16855 - 2005-03-31
: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU JUSTICES
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16855 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 47
is in custody, however, is one of law, and, thus, we review that question de novo based on the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168383 - 2017-09-21
is in custody, however, is one of law, and, thus, we review that question de novo based on the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168383 - 2017-09-21