Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29131 - 29140 of 44730 for part.

COURT OF APPEALS
motion, holding that the court had no power to grant the motion. It stated in relevant part: In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49797 - 2010-05-11

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Candice P.
or inability. Under the new law [the parent] faced loss of ... parental rights, in material part, merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10021 - 2005-03-31

Continental Western Insurance Company v. Paul Reid, LLP
policy issued to Paul Reid. The policy provides, in relevant part: B. Exclusions …. 2. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24764 - 2006-05-30

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Sostarich
. § 371 (conspiracy to defraud the United States) as part of a bargain in which the prosecutor dismissed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18808 - 2005-06-28

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 5, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appeal...
for his sexual behavior and concluded the offense was part of a pattern of sexual abuse. It examined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36386 - 2009-05-26

CA Blank Order
of arguable merit could arise from this point. Whether a defendant is ERP- or CIP-eligible is a part
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97439 - 2013-05-28

State v. Daniel Joseph Chaulklin
accident that was caused, at least in part, by Chaulklin driving through a stop sign without first stopping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8858 - 2005-03-31

State v. John L. Kuslits
] explain how the sentence’s component parts promote the sentencing objectives. By stating this linkage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6859 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
a practice of doing so, and therefore those statements did not allege any action on Riley’s part that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103379 - 2013-10-21

State v. Walter J. Kugler
. [2] Wisconsin Stat. § 346.57(4) provides, in part: “[N]o person shall drive a vehicle at a speed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2334 - 2005-03-31