Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29131 - 29140 of 64147 for records/1000.
Search results 29131 - 29140 of 64147 for records/1000.
State v. Keith S. Betts
[or her] motion to raise a question of fact, or presents only conclusionary allegations, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4538 - 2005-03-31
[or her] motion to raise a question of fact, or presents only conclusionary allegations, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4538 - 2005-03-31
State v. Laura K-T.
in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” Tara P., 252 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6407 - 2005-03-31
in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” Tara P., 252 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6407 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deandre Brown
counsel. Because probable cause for his arrest did exist and the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19087 - 2005-07-25
counsel. Because probable cause for his arrest did exist and the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19087 - 2005-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
in the Beckers’ divorce and as previously ordered by the court. Because the record establishes Jonathan’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92689 - 2013-02-12
in the Beckers’ divorce and as previously ordered by the court. Because the record establishes Jonathan’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92689 - 2013-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion because it “failed to explain on the record why the DNA surcharge ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95671 - 2013-04-28
erroneously exercised its discretion because it “failed to explain on the record why the DNA surcharge ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95671 - 2013-04-28
[PDF]
State v. Tyshion D. Davis
possession was in the record, it was not referenced by the trial court or the parties. The prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26565 - 2017-09-21
possession was in the record, it was not referenced by the trial court or the parties. The prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26565 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Louis Kapischke v. County of Walworth
(1996), the supreme court held that “both the open meetings and open records laws are exempt from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13771 - 2014-09-15
(1996), the supreme court held that “both the open meetings and open records laws are exempt from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13771 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it “did not hear that” and replayed the recording with the court reporter simultaneously transcribing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140750 - 2017-09-21
it “did not hear that” and replayed the recording with the court reporter simultaneously transcribing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140750 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. Attorney Bauer was the attorney primarily responsible for the record keeping for both the trust
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212847 - 2018-05-16
. Attorney Bauer was the attorney primarily responsible for the record keeping for both the trust
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212847 - 2018-05-16
[PDF]
State v. Brian Anderson
was arrested. In the affidavit, Smith also represented that agency records detailed Anderson's involvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7806 - 2017-09-19
was arrested. In the affidavit, Smith also represented that agency records detailed Anderson's involvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7806 - 2017-09-19