Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29141 - 29150 of 68246 for law.

[PDF] NOTICE
to relief. Id. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35125 - 2014-09-15

David J. Barkow v. Matthew J. Ciesielczyk
give the terms of a statute their ordinary meaning. Id. "These are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9481 - 2008-03-31

State v. James W. Rice, Jr.
is a question of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Garcia, 195 Wis. 2d 68, 73, 535 N.W.2d 124 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2555 - 2005-03-31

Rainbow Springs Golf Company, Inc. v. Town of Mukwonago
arbitrarily, unreasonably, and oppressively when it revoked the CUP and acted contrary to law. In a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18336 - 2005-07-26

Balbayis Asset Consultants v. Jeff Clark
will be sustained if it has applied the proper law to the established facts and if there is any reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6303 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of the rules of law applicable to the case and to assist the jury in making a reasonable analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34031 - 2009-06-03

Landshire Fast Foods of Milwaukee, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company
of material fact exist and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6338 - 2005-03-31

Douglas Ingram v. David H. Schwarz
Sikora. Following the hearing, the administrative law judge (ALJ) issued a decision finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13669 - 2008-12-29

COURT OF APPEALS
, the cause was submitted on the brief of Robert C. Kupfer of Kupfer Law Offices, S.C. of Kenosha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35016 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). Deignan contends that his arrest was not lawful because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93320 - 2013-03-03