Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29151 - 29160 of 33116 for vital statistics form.

[PDF] Karen M. Joyce v. Town of Tainter
and obsolescence, zoning restrictions, neighborhood conditions, sales studies and equalization forms from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15095 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
forms of sexual contact requires the defendant acted with intent to become sexually aroused
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191002 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
eviction); Bullen v. Fellner, 86 Wis. 2d 116, 121, 271 N.W.2d 673 (1978) (non-payment of rent cannot form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995770 - 2025-08-21

[PDF] State v. Richard N. Konkol
and coke. The State reasonably assumed that this would form the basis of his defense at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4273 - 2017-09-19

State v. James B. Williams
states, in relevant part: “[I]f an act forms the basis for a crime punishable under more than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5785 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas P. Sterzinger
‘with intent that’, or some form of the verbs ‘know’ or ‘believe’.”). We agree with the State’s contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4018 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
In 2019, White filed the WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion that forms the basis for this appeal. In his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383393 - 2021-07-07

[PDF] Paul Closser v. Town of Harding
complaints sought relief in the form of an order to vacate the part of the plat that had not been improved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11619 - 2017-09-19

State v. Rory D. Revels
in the form of “findings,” test “results” or a description of the expert’s proposed testimony. We interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13200 - 2005-03-31

Raymond G. Sugden v. Cory R. Bock
nor the form of language in the policy necessarily controls the question.” Ahnapee & W. Ry. Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3956 - 2005-03-31