Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29161 - 29170 of 33975 for dismissed.
Search results 29161 - 29170 of 33975 for dismissed.
State v. George H. Tutor
to dismiss the second count. Upon conviction, the trial court imposed the minimum penalty available under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3677 - 2005-03-31
to dismiss the second count. Upon conviction, the trial court imposed the minimum penalty available under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3677 - 2005-03-31
State v. David L. Elliott
, and he set the matter for a jury trial on May 15, 1995. Elliott then brought a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10196 - 2005-03-31
, and he set the matter for a jury trial on May 15, 1995. Elliott then brought a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10196 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Mark S. Lisiecki
with a prohibited alcohol level, and operating while suspended. Upon Lisiecki’s motion, the court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4800 - 2017-09-20
with a prohibited alcohol level, and operating while suspended. Upon Lisiecki’s motion, the court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4800 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Graeme J. Paxton v. Vulcan Basement Waterproofing Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
that the Paxtons’ cause of action under WIS. STAT. § 100.18 should have been dismissed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15379 - 2017-09-21
that the Paxtons’ cause of action under WIS. STAT. § 100.18 should have been dismissed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 234
to her teeth.” Elkhorn responded with a motion to dismiss. Citing WIS. STAT. § 893.80(4) (2003-04),5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26842 - 2014-09-15
to her teeth.” Elkhorn responded with a motion to dismiss. Citing WIS. STAT. § 893.80(4) (2003-04),5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26842 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Lee J. B.
to dismiss for lack of a notice and warning to Lee that his parental rights might be terminated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2657 - 2017-09-19
to dismiss for lack of a notice and warning to Lee that his parental rights might be terminated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2657 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Acuity
and dismissed the claims against Acuity with prejudice, granting costs and disbursements. A written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7564 - 2017-09-19
and dismissed the claims against Acuity with prejudice, granting costs and disbursements. A written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7564 - 2017-09-19
2011 WI APP 48
, J. James L. Milton, Tania Milton, and Jesse J. Hoffman appeal a summary judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60534 - 2011-04-19
, J. James L. Milton, Tania Milton, and Jesse J. Hoffman appeal a summary judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60534 - 2011-04-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and 5, all as a repeater, and the remaining counts were dismissed and read in at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1031079 - 2025-11-05
, and 5, all as a repeater, and the remaining counts were dismissed and read in at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1031079 - 2025-11-05
[PDF]
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
underlying the dismissed charges. Neither did Tucker. In fact, at sentencing Tucker had personally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18978 - 2017-09-21
underlying the dismissed charges. Neither did Tucker. In fact, at sentencing Tucker had personally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18978 - 2017-09-21