Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29171 - 29180 of 29958 for de.
Search results 29171 - 29180 of 29958 for de.
State v. Patrick A. Saunders
of undisputed facts. This is a question of law to which we apply de novo review. State v. Liebnitz, 231 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16472 - 2005-03-31
of undisputed facts. This is a question of law to which we apply de novo review. State v. Liebnitz, 231 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16472 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
upon the proper interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 974.06. This is a question of law that we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52288 - 2010-07-15
upon the proper interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 974.06. This is a question of law that we review de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52288 - 2010-07-15
State v. David J. Roberson
. We review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25747 - 2006-06-29
. We review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25747 - 2006-06-29
[PDF]
Linda Rohde-Giovanni v. Paul Albert Baumgart
of maintenance should not be adjusted. ¶9 Baumgart then requested a de novo hearing. Judge Patrick J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16562 - 2017-09-21
of maintenance should not be adjusted. ¶9 Baumgart then requested a de novo hearing. Judge Patrick J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16562 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Barbara G. Hokin v. Lowell E. Hokin
the correct legal standard is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14944 - 2017-09-21
the correct legal standard is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14944 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Delores Sawyer v. Berit H. Midelfort, M.D.
., 219 Wis. 2d 250, 259, 580 N.W.2d 233 (1998). This court reviews questions of law de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17284 - 2017-09-21
., 219 Wis. 2d 250, 259, 580 N.W.2d 233 (1998). This court reviews questions of law de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17284 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of limitations.” This inconsistency is ultimately immaterial, given our de novo standard of review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249659 - 2019-11-05
of limitations.” This inconsistency is ultimately immaterial, given our de novo standard of review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249659 - 2019-11-05
[PDF]
WI 32
the defendant due process raise questions of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64285 - 2014-09-15
the defendant due process raise questions of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64285 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Conley Publishing Group Ltd. v. Journal Communications, Inc.
. Allis, 2000 WI 126, ¶26, 239 Wis. 2d 595, 619 N.W.2d 692. Although our review is de novo, we benefit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16570 - 2017-09-21
. Allis, 2000 WI 126, ¶26, 239 Wis. 2d 595, 619 N.W.2d 692. Although our review is de novo, we benefit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16570 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 22
“The interpretation and application of a constitutional provision are questions of law that we review de novo.” State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970369 - 2025-06-13
“The interpretation and application of a constitutional provision are questions of law that we review de novo.” State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970369 - 2025-06-13