Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29171 - 29180 of 30066 for de.
Search results 29171 - 29180 of 30066 for de.
[PDF]
State v. David M. Murrell
prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12641 - 2017-09-21
prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12641 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Sorenson, 2000 WI 43, ¶15, 234 Wis. 2d 648, 611 N.W.2d 240
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33413 - 2008-07-14
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Sorenson, 2000 WI 43, ¶15, 234 Wis. 2d 648, 611 N.W.2d 240
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33413 - 2008-07-14
[PDF]
WI 39
erroneous, but we review the referee’s conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996925 - 2025-08-14
erroneous, but we review the referee’s conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996925 - 2025-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769. Statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28630 - 2007-06-26
interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769. Statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28630 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
Joseph Finnegan v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
interpretation, subject to de novo appellate review. Czapinski v. St. Francis Hosp., 2000 WI 80, ¶12, 236 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16559 - 2017-09-21
interpretation, subject to de novo appellate review. Czapinski v. St. Francis Hosp., 2000 WI 80, ¶12, 236 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16559 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
issues that we decide de novo. See Kersten v. H.C. Prange Co., 186 Wis. 2d 49, 56, 520 N.W.2d 99 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717354 - 2023-10-19
issues that we decide de novo. See Kersten v. H.C. Prange Co., 186 Wis. 2d 49, 56, 520 N.W.2d 99 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717354 - 2023-10-19
[PDF]
WI App 60
, which we review de novo.” State v. Trammell, 2019 WI 59, ¶16, 387 Wis. 2d 156, 928 N.W.2d 564
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574838 - 2023-01-12
, which we review de novo.” State v. Trammell, 2019 WI 59, ¶16, 387 Wis. 2d 156, 928 N.W.2d 564
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574838 - 2023-01-12
[PDF]
Ken Kempfer v. Automated Finishing, Inc.
de novo. Winkelman v. Beloit Memorial Hospital, 168 Wis. 2d 12, 24, 483 N.W.2d 211 (1992
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16994 - 2017-09-21
de novo. Winkelman v. Beloit Memorial Hospital, 168 Wis. 2d 12, 24, 483 N.W.2d 211 (1992
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16994 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 64
of law that this court reviews de novo. Mayo v. Wisconsin Injured Patients and Fams. Comp. Fund, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013112 - 2026-01-20
of law that this court reviews de novo. Mayo v. Wisconsin Injured Patients and Fams. Comp. Fund, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013112 - 2026-01-20
[PDF]
WI 96
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Sorenson, 2000 WI 43, ¶15, 234 Wis. 2d 648, 611 N.W.2d 240
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33413 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Sorenson, 2000 WI 43, ¶15, 234 Wis. 2d 648, 611 N.W.2d 240
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33413 - 2014-09-15