Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29171 - 29180 of 83808 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 29171 - 29180 of 83808 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
” of the case in a document received by the district attorney’s office on June 1, 2012. Under § 971.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104801 - 2013-11-25
” of the case in a document received by the district attorney’s office on June 1, 2012. Under § 971.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104801 - 2013-11-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159831 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159831 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues that a circuit court may not direct a verdict in a traffic forfeiture case. Turner apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30119 - 2014-09-15
argues that a circuit court may not direct a verdict in a traffic forfeiture case. Turner apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30119 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135178 - 2015-02-12
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135178 - 2015-02-12
Reich Law Firm, LLC v. Jamee K. Peters
in a divorce action. Peters paid a retainer of $1,000. Following completion of the case, Reich billed her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2447 - 2005-03-31
in a divorce action. Peters paid a retainer of $1,000. Following completion of the case, Reich billed her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2447 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CV-455; Petition for Name Change for Minor Child under 14
with additional materials Page 1 of 2 Enter the name of the county in which this case was filed. STATE
/formdisplay/CV-481.pdf?formNumber=CV-481&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-11-09
with additional materials Page 1 of 2 Enter the name of the county in which this case was filed. STATE
/formdisplay/CV-481.pdf?formNumber=CV-481&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-11-09
CA Blank Order
to observe the driver. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102036 - 2013-09-15
to observe the driver. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102036 - 2013-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
advised him of his right to file a response. Smith has not responded. We conclude that these cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156912 - 2017-09-21
advised him of his right to file a response. Smith has not responded. We conclude that these cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156912 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction in each of three cases. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report as to these consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869354 - 2024-10-30
of conviction in each of three cases. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report as to these consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869354 - 2024-10-30
[PDF]
Reich Law Firm, LLC v. Jamee K. Peters
completion of the case, Reich billed her for an additional $4,825.75. Peters refused to pay and Reich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2447 - 2017-09-19
completion of the case, Reich billed her for an additional $4,825.75. Peters refused to pay and Reich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2447 - 2017-09-19