Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29171 - 29180 of 46225 for thefelix.top ⭕🏹 The Felix ⭕🏹 du an The Felix ⭕🏹 can ho The Felix ⭕🏹 chung cu The Felix.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by the [circuit court] at sentencing are not required to outweigh the seriousness of the offense before they can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74191 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Brian T. Vadnais
for such examination has passed. Defendants can vacillate before their pleas, not after. Nesbitt v. United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8892 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the victim’s statement can be attributed only to a single source—the forceful taking of her purse. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194605 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
and the names of the authoring justices, can be found on the attached table. March 2023 Term
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644932 - 2023-04-11

09AP574 State v. Gerald A. LaDue.doc
jail. ¶11 We can affirm a circuit court for different reasons. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38058 - 2009-07-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
before this court. State v. Drake, 184 Wis. 2d 396, 399, 515 N.W.2d 923 (Ct. App. 1994). Nor can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06

[PDF] State v. Ramon Sanchez-Diaz
) (ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel can be a “sufficient reason” under State v. Escalona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16210 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Matthew M. Engevold
to properly measure the prejudice suffered by Mr. Engevold.” Further, it states that “no one can say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13572 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
that was not sufficiently corroborated. It is well-established that reasonable suspicion can be based on an informant’s tip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125387 - 2014-10-27

State v. Kim D. Tesky
. The reason you can be imprisoned up to three years is because they claim that, due to prior convictions, you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11185 - 2005-03-31