Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29181 - 29190 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 29181 - 29190 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
Patricia A.M. v. Patricia S.
guardian, but previously would have opposed Patricia’s appointment. The court also fulfilled its duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3212 - 2005-03-31
guardian, but previously would have opposed Patricia’s appointment. The court also fulfilled its duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3212 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ruth M. Davis
to suppress evidence based on an unlawful arrest. Officer Fazel testified as follows. She was on duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19140 - 2017-09-21
to suppress evidence based on an unlawful arrest. Officer Fazel testified as follows. She was on duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19140 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SC Clerk-Ltr
with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license to practice law in Wisconsin has
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375598 - 2021-06-07
with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license to practice law in Wisconsin has
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375598 - 2021-06-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
move it as “pretty heavy-duty.” The court also found “striking” that Harris’s dismissed-and-read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970552 - 2025-06-18
move it as “pretty heavy-duty.” The court also found “striking” that Harris’s dismissed-and-read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970552 - 2025-06-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 818 N.W.2d 904 (setting forth mandatory duties under § 970.02(1)(a), including: “In the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738968 - 2023-12-13
, 818 N.W.2d 904 (setting forth mandatory duties under § 970.02(1)(a), including: “In the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738968 - 2023-12-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
duties such that a challenge to the entry of Smith’s no-contest pleas would lack arguable merit.3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615422 - 2023-02-01
duties such that a challenge to the entry of Smith’s no-contest pleas would lack arguable merit.3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615422 - 2023-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
constitutional duty to provide him with exculpatory evidence that was in its possession. More specifically
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617807 - 2023-02-07
constitutional duty to provide him with exculpatory evidence that was in its possession. More specifically
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617807 - 2023-02-07
State v. Doran J. London
is not in the record. It is the duty of the appellant to see that relevant evidence is included in the record. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11633 - 2005-03-31
is not in the record. It is the duty of the appellant to see that relevant evidence is included in the record. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Sturm
performing their duties. State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 56, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). ¶9 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6696 - 2017-09-20
performing their duties. State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 56, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). ¶9 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6696 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
). However, because appointed counsel asks to be discharged from the duty of representation, we must
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108292 - 2014-02-25
). However, because appointed counsel asks to be discharged from the duty of representation, we must
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108292 - 2014-02-25

