Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29191 - 29200 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.

WI App 33 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP1092 Complete Title of...
no dedication of the land at issue and the State’s representation that it would not have a claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138279 - 2015-04-28

Lincoln County v. April G.
in foster care. In March 1997, the County initiated ch. 48, Stats., proceedings claiming that Cheyenne
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15890 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct. App. 1996). To succeed on his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83649 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
warrants sentence modification. Id., ¶37. West’s claim that a new factor exists is premised primarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210927 - 2018-04-06

[PDF] State v. Michael L. Anderson
was proper. Anderson premises his claim of confusion on statements made by his trial attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4599 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing challenge on appeal to his claim that the trial court based its sentence on the mistaken premise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51410 - 2010-06-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 On appeal, Elim claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87379 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
limit. Kretman claimed the amended policy limit did not apply, and that the applicable limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360253 - 2021-04-27

[PDF] Wangard Partners, Inc. v. Tandem Tire and Auto Service, Inc.
to it in a stipulation meeting the requirements of WIS. STAT. § 807.05. Wangard claims the court erred in enforcing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20067 - 2017-09-21

Lisa J. Brown v. MR Group, LLC
cannot reasonably claim that Seay applies here. ¶11 Counsel erroneously relies on Novak v. Phillips
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6815 - 2005-03-31