Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29191 - 29200 of 30059 for de.
Search results 29191 - 29200 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
Orion Flight Services, Inc. v. Basler Flight Service
This case presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25227 - 2017-09-21
This case presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25227 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 42
in this appeal de novo, because they involve purely questions of statutory interpretation that we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79598 - 2014-09-15
in this appeal de novo, because they involve purely questions of statutory interpretation that we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79598 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
in the plea colloquy that establish a violation of § 971.08, is a question of law that this court reviews de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238262 - 2019-05-30
in the plea colloquy that establish a violation of § 971.08, is a question of law that this court reviews de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238262 - 2019-05-30
Geoffrey L. Bilda v. Milwaukee County
, 2001. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25969 - 2006-08-29
, 2001. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25969 - 2006-08-29
Frontsheet
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Sorenson, 2000 WI 43, ¶15, 234 Wis. 2d 648, 611 N.W.2d 240
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33413 - 2008-07-14
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Sorenson, 2000 WI 43, ¶15, 234 Wis. 2d 648, 611 N.W.2d 240
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33413 - 2008-07-14
[PDF]
WI APP 109
, thus presenting questions of law subject to de novo review. See Preston v. Meriter Hosp., 2008 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36995 - 2014-09-15
, thus presenting questions of law subject to de novo review. See Preston v. Meriter Hosp., 2008 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36995 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
conclusions of fact, but review issues of law de novo. WIS. STAT. SERV. EMPS. INT’L UNION HEALTHCARE WIS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976935 - 2025-06-27
conclusions of fact, but review issues of law de novo. WIS. STAT. SERV. EMPS. INT’L UNION HEALTHCARE WIS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976935 - 2025-06-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28630 - 2014-09-15
questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28630 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 39
erroneous, but we review the referee’s conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996925 - 2025-08-14
erroneous, but we review the referee’s conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996925 - 2025-08-14
[PDF]
WI 92
the construction of statutory terms de novo. See State v. Harmon, 2006 WI App 214, ¶8, 296 Wis. 2d 861, 723 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33408 - 2014-09-15
the construction of statutory terms de novo. See State v. Harmon, 2006 WI App 214, ¶8, 296 Wis. 2d 861, 723 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33408 - 2014-09-15