Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29191 - 29200 of 42961 for t o.
Search results 29191 - 29200 of 42961 for t o.
COURT OF APPEALS
it rejected the parties’ joint sentencing recommendation. The court was not required to do so. “[T]he court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30977 - 2007-11-26
it rejected the parties’ joint sentencing recommendation. The court was not required to do so. “[T]he court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30977 - 2007-11-26
Local 1287 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
, Petitioners-Appellants, v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission and Garry T. Van Ouse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6414 - 2005-03-31
, Petitioners-Appellants, v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission and Garry T. Van Ouse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6414 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals 2019-03-19T08:07:36-0500 CCAP
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237622 - 2019-03-19
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals 2019-03-19T08:07:36-0500 CCAP
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237622 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Oconto County: MICHAEL T. JUDGE, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. ¶1 SEIDL, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174136 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Oconto County: MICHAEL T. JUDGE, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. ¶1 SEIDL, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174136 - 2017-09-21
WI App 63 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1582-CR Complete Title...
“[T]he purpose of statutory interpretation is to determine what the statute means so that it may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96064 - 2013-05-28
“[T]he purpose of statutory interpretation is to determine what the statute means so that it may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96064 - 2013-05-28
COURT OF APPEALS
testified, “[I]t’s not only his loudness and yelling and shouting, but he gets very close to you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55722 - 2010-10-18
testified, “[I]t’s not only his loudness and yelling and shouting, but he gets very close to you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55722 - 2010-10-18
State v. Michael A. Smaxwell
but never signed the consent form. Id. at 535. The court held that: [T]he dissipation of alcohol from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3721 - 2005-03-31
but never signed the consent form. Id. at 535. The court held that: [T]he dissipation of alcohol from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3721 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
§ 807.05. The City responds “[t]he offer made to Limpert by the City was an unaccepted plea offer which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27332 - 2006-12-04
§ 807.05. The City responds “[t]he offer made to Limpert by the City was an unaccepted plea offer which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27332 - 2006-12-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
… supporting the requested relief” had been shown and that “[t]he law does not permit the court to grant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161497 - 2017-09-21
… supporting the requested relief” had been shown and that “[t]he law does not permit the court to grant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161497 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jose R.
possessing tetrahydrocannabinols, see Wis. Stat. §§ 961.01(14), 961.14(4)(t), and 961.41(3g)(e), and two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
possessing tetrahydrocannabinols, see Wis. Stat. §§ 961.01(14), 961.14(4)(t), and 961.41(3g)(e), and two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01