Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 15298 for 2013.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 15298 for 2013.
CA Blank Order
as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136732 - 2015-03-03
as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136732 - 2015-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176406 - 2017-09-21
report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176406 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT IV March 21, 2013 To: Hon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94483 - 2014-09-15
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT IV March 21, 2013 To: Hon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94483 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) (2013-14). An adequate factual basis supported the conviction. The record shows the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174941 - 2017-09-21
) (2013-14). An adequate factual basis supported the conviction. The record shows the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174941 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164686 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164686 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168972 - 2017-09-21
. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168972 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
offense. Silverman’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142448 - 2015-05-26
offense. Silverman’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142448 - 2015-05-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2013-14). 1 We affirm the judgment of the circuit court. This case arises from a dispute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179843 - 2017-09-21
(2013-14). 1 We affirm the judgment of the circuit court. This case arises from a dispute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179843 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14).[1] He argues that: (1) his trial counsel was constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143720 - 2015-06-25
under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14).[1] He argues that: (1) his trial counsel was constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143720 - 2015-06-25
CA Blank Order
809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Taylor received a copy of the report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146239 - 2015-08-18
809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Taylor received a copy of the report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146239 - 2015-08-18