Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
WI 30
) the circuit court erred when it denied his motion for a directed verdict, and (2) he should be granted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64253 - 2014-09-15
) the circuit court erred when it denied his motion for a directed verdict, and (2) he should be granted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64253 - 2014-09-15
Ronald J. v. Lisa R.
seeking visitation, which was granted. Laurel also filed a motion seeking custody of Nina. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3271 - 2005-03-31
seeking visitation, which was granted. Laurel also filed a motion seeking custody of Nina. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3271 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment and the circuit court granted their motions.[3] The circuit court did not reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44704 - 2009-12-16
for summary judgment and the circuit court granted their motions.[3] The circuit court did not reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44704 - 2009-12-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
their motions.3 The circuit court did not reach the Kerlyluks’ underlying legal theory—that Riley and Knoop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44704 - 2014-09-15
their motions.3 The circuit court did not reach the Kerlyluks’ underlying legal theory—that Riley and Knoop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44704 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the girlfriend’s testimony that Miller was in custody. The prosecutor objected to the mistrial motion, arguing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122766 - 2014-10-01
of the girlfriend’s testimony that Miller was in custody. The prosecutor objected to the mistrial motion, arguing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122766 - 2014-10-01
State v. Lindsey A.F.
A.F.[1] The State asserts that because the juvenile was not in custody, the circuit court lacked
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16462 - 2005-03-31
A.F.[1] The State asserts that because the juvenile was not in custody, the circuit court lacked
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16462 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lindsey A.F.
A.F.[1] The State asserts that because the juvenile was not in custody, the circuit court lacked
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16461 - 2005-03-31
A.F.[1] The State asserts that because the juvenile was not in custody, the circuit court lacked
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16461 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FA-4170V summary
FORM SUMMARY Name of Form: Notice of Motion and Motion to Change (Legal Custody, Physical
/formdisplay/FA-4170_summary.pdf?formNumber=FA-4170&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-07-10
FORM SUMMARY Name of Form: Notice of Motion and Motion to Change (Legal Custody, Physical
/formdisplay/FA-4170_summary.pdf?formNumber=FA-4170&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-07-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” ¶6 On the same day that Jora filed its answer, Plaza and Jora filed a joint motion to consolidate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646215 - 2023-04-24
.” ¶6 On the same day that Jora filed its answer, Plaza and Jora filed a joint motion to consolidate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646215 - 2023-04-24
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court accepts two cases
of the Joint Committee on Finance; Senator Chris Kapenga and Representative Robin Vos, in their official
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/ac0224.pdf - 2024-02-26
of the Joint Committee on Finance; Senator Chris Kapenga and Representative Robin Vos, in their official
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/ac0224.pdf - 2024-02-26