Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 83281 for civil case no. "90-77".
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 83281 for civil case no. "90-77".
Wisconsin Court System - Supreme Court Rules - Pending petition
. Date Filed Description Petition Documents Jul 24, 2007 In re discretionary transfer of civil cases
/scrules/archive/0711.htm - 2026-04-29
. Date Filed Description Petition Documents Jul 24, 2007 In re discretionary transfer of civil cases
/scrules/archive/0711.htm - 2026-04-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be granted. We agree with the circuit court in each case and, accordingly, also affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=703336 - 2023-09-14
be granted. We agree with the circuit court in each case and, accordingly, also affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=703336 - 2023-09-14
[PDF]
Approval Date: 02/02/2017 Page 1
be used in any appropriate injunction proceeding, including domestic abuse (civil or family court
/formdisplay/CV-435_summary.pdf?formNumber=CV-435&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2018-08-14
be used in any appropriate injunction proceeding, including domestic abuse (civil or family court
/formdisplay/CV-435_summary.pdf?formNumber=CV-435&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2018-08-14
[PDF]
State v. Thomas H. Bush
2005 WI 103 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2003AP2306 COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18883 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI 103 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2003AP2306 COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18883 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 20-09 supporting memo
limits are excessive for civil cases. This proposed change does not impact the court’s discretion
/supreme/docs/2009memo.pdf - 2020-12-15
limits are excessive for civil cases. This proposed change does not impact the court’s discretion
/supreme/docs/2009memo.pdf - 2020-12-15
[PDF]
WI App 76
2021 WI App 76 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2020AP1062
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436268 - 2021-12-09
2021 WI App 76 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2020AP1062
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436268 - 2021-12-09
Karen M. Polakowski v. John R. Polakowski
2003 WI App 20 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-1961-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5494 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI App 20 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-1961-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Karen M. Polakowski v. John R. Polakowski
2003 WI App 20 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1961-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5494 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 20 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1961-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5494 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
David Pender v. City of Appleton
and suppressed unlawfully seized evidence in this civil case.2 For authority, he cites City of Milwaukee v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15119 - 2017-09-21
and suppressed unlawfully seized evidence in this civil case.2 For authority, he cites City of Milwaukee v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15119 - 2017-09-21
David Pender v. City of Appleton
hearing and suppressed unlawfully seized evidence in this civil case.[2] For authority, he cites City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15119 - 2005-04-18
hearing and suppressed unlawfully seized evidence in this civil case.[2] For authority, he cites City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15119 - 2005-04-18