Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 44735 for part.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 44735 for part.
[PDF]
State v. Robert John Kotz
in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. CANE, P.J. The State appeals the trial court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10856 - 2017-09-20
in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. CANE, P.J. The State appeals the trial court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10856 - 2017-09-20
State v. Patricia T.
, an alleged or presumed father of the child or the child conditional in any part upon transfer or surrender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3503 - 2005-03-31
, an alleged or presumed father of the child or the child conditional in any part upon transfer or surrender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3503 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patricia T.
, an alleged or presumed father of the child or the child conditional in any part upon transfer or surrender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3501 - 2005-03-31
, an alleged or presumed father of the child or the child conditional in any part upon transfer or surrender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3501 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55724 - 2010-10-18
in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55724 - 2010-10-18
[PDF]
JAG Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Door County Board of Adjustment
provided in relevant part: Because the basis for the Order by [the zoning administrator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10458 - 2017-09-20
provided in relevant part: Because the basis for the Order by [the zoning administrator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10458 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
). Wisconsin Const. art. VII, § 8 provides in relevant part that “[e]xcept as otherwise provided by law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
). Wisconsin Const. art. VII, § 8 provides in relevant part that “[e]xcept as otherwise provided by law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
Steve Hause v. Robert Sauer
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Sauk County: virginia a. wolfe, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13436 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Sauk County: virginia a. wolfe, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Shannon E. T. v. Alicia M. V.M.
. Wisconsin’s paternity statute, WIS. STAT. § 767.45, provides in relevant part: (1) The following
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19000 - 2017-09-21
. Wisconsin’s paternity statute, WIS. STAT. § 767.45, provides in relevant part: (1) The following
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19000 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
as other (affirmed in part, reversed in part, affirmed and remanded, dismissed, modified and as modified
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830877 - 2024-07-23
as other (affirmed in part, reversed in part, affirmed and remanded, dismissed, modified and as modified
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830877 - 2024-07-23
State v. Guy S. Ruppenthal
Attorney’s Office to the county criminal court judges was an improper ex parte communication. The letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14215 - 2005-03-31
Attorney’s Office to the county criminal court judges was an improper ex parte communication. The letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14215 - 2005-03-31