Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 82927 for simple case search.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 82927 for simple case search.
Wisconsin Court System - Supreme Court oral arguments
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/opinions/soralarguments.htm - 2025-12-18
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/opinions/soralarguments.htm - 2025-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
. In that case, the warrant was searching for specific stolen items, but described those items using very generic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2010-04-27
. In that case, the warrant was searching for specific stolen items, but described those items using very generic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2010-04-27
State v. James E. Janssen
court erred when it declined to suppress both the fruits of search warrants as well as his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11897 - 2005-03-31
court erred when it declined to suppress both the fruits of search warrants as well as his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11897 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Renee Kimps v. Leonard M. Hill
for Portage County, Frederic W. Fleishauer, Judge. The case arose as a negligence action brought by Renee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16852 - 2017-09-21
for Portage County, Frederic W. Fleishauer, Judge. The case arose as a negligence action brought by Renee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16852 - 2017-09-21
Renee Kimps v. Leonard M. Hill
Court for Portage County, Frederic W. Fleishauer, Judge. The case arose as a negligence action brought
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16852 - 2005-03-31
Court for Portage County, Frederic W. Fleishauer, Judge. The case arose as a negligence action brought
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16852 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Id. at 336. The search warrant in the present case reads as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84134 - 2012-07-02
we review de novo. Id. at 336. The search warrant in the present case reads as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84134 - 2012-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The search warrant in the present case reads as follows: WHEREAS, Eric Essinger has this day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84134 - 2014-09-15
. The search warrant in the present case reads as follows: WHEREAS, Eric Essinger has this day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84134 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Whether such reasonable suspicion exists to justify a protective search requires a case-by-case evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
Whether such reasonable suspicion exists to justify a protective search requires a case-by-case evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88774 - 2012-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
such reasonable suspicion exists to justify a protective search requires a case-by-case evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88774 - 2014-09-15
such reasonable suspicion exists to justify a protective search requires a case-by-case evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88774 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Anthony Hicks v. Willie J. Nunnery
2002 WI App 87 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0751
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3744 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 87 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0751
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3744 - 2017-09-19