Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 83455 for simple case search.
State v. Lance R. Ward
judgment in weighing the sufficiency of search warrant applications in marginal cases, the State asks us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12738 - 2005-03-31
judgment in weighing the sufficiency of search warrant applications in marginal cases, the State asks us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12738 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith A. Johnson
. In this case, Knoble and Johnson filed motions to suppress evidence alleging that the searches were performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14696 - 2013-09-18
. In this case, Knoble and Johnson filed motions to suppress evidence alleging that the searches were performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14696 - 2013-09-18
State v. Rocky A. Knoble
. In this case, Knoble and Johnson filed motions to suppress evidence alleging that the searches were performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14695 - 2013-09-18
. In this case, Knoble and Johnson filed motions to suppress evidence alleging that the searches were performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14695 - 2013-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
challenge to the validity of the search warrant in this case, however, to the “oath or affirmation” clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285079 - 2020-09-09
challenge to the validity of the search warrant in this case, however, to the “oath or affirmation” clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285079 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
Famous Cases of the Wisconsin Supreme Court - State v. Stevens
such case. In this case, a divided Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that police may seize and search
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases19.pdf - 2009-11-17
such case. In this case, a divided Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that police may seize and search
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases19.pdf - 2009-11-17
[PDF]
State v. Patrice M. Ehrenberger
; and (2) if the latter, was there probable cause to arrest in this case. We conclude that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15078 - 2017-09-21
; and (2) if the latter, was there probable cause to arrest in this case. We conclude that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15078 - 2017-09-21
State v. Patrice M. Ehrenberger
Bentley and the instant case, is an “exigent circumstances” case—one in which a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15078 - 2005-03-31
Bentley and the instant case, is an “exigent circumstances” case—one in which a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15078 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith Schroeder
of federal cases have addressed the scope of searches of computer contents, one of which is on all fours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15529 - 2017-09-21
of federal cases have addressed the scope of searches of computer contents, one of which is on all fours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15529 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Keith Schroeder
of federal cases have addressed the scope of searches of computer contents, one of which is on all fours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15926 - 2017-09-21
of federal cases have addressed the scope of searches of computer contents, one of which is on all fours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15926 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul H. Gates
for the search of adjacent property. We think it is an appropriate question on the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9826 - 2017-09-19
for the search of adjacent property. We think it is an appropriate question on the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9826 - 2017-09-19