Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 58508 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Cleuza Schuh v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
appeal under RULE 809.17, STATS. No. 98-1398-FT 2 The Schuhs contend that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14026 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Melinda Webber
trial. Webber argues that the trial court erred in denying her postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12734 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
denying his postconviction motion. Hopkins claims his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5146 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Leea N. Power v. James M. Muhammad
., Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 CURLEY, J. James M. Muhammad appeals, pro se, from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17971 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of trial counsel. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective in four ways. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66544 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
claims his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance when he: (1) failed to object to hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4786 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
denying his postconviction motion. Hopkins claims his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2013-11-18

State v. Jacqueline Farence
a pair of related judgments of conviction and an order denying her motion for a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5150 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
] Washington complains that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to dismiss the complaint. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94413 - 2013-03-25

[PDF] Janice L. Geline v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
the town should have been permitted to intervene in the action; and (5) whether the trial court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8792 - 2017-09-19