Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 7646 for yes.
Search results 2921 - 2930 of 7646 for yes.
State v. Craig R. Nelson
COUNSEL]: Your Honor, yes, I believe that … the facts as you stated them are correct. THE COURT: So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21048 - 2006-01-24
COUNSEL]: Your Honor, yes, I believe that … the facts as you stated them are correct. THE COURT: So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21048 - 2006-01-24
[PDF]
WI APP 219
that right? No. 2006AP1475 4 A. Yes. ¶6 Smalley first posits (and the State implicitly agrees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30318 - 2014-09-15
that right? No. 2006AP1475 4 A. Yes. ¶6 Smalley first posits (and the State implicitly agrees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30318 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is whatever we talk about here has to be the truth. Okay? ….” [R.J.] … “Yes.” [Officer] “All right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163997 - 2017-09-21
is whatever we talk about here has to be the truth. Okay? ….” [R.J.] … “Yes.” [Officer] “All right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Earl L. Diehl
was "overall" their understanding of the plea agreement and each answered yes. The court then engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9627 - 2017-09-19
was "overall" their understanding of the plea agreement and each answered yes. The court then engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9627 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. And I think that you had to go to Lincoln Hills; correct? Right? [Casper:] Yes. Yes. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350167 - 2021-03-30
. And I think that you had to go to Lincoln Hills; correct? Right? [Casper:] Yes. Yes. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350167 - 2021-03-30
COURT OF APPEALS
: Yes, ma’am. THE COURT: Did you read this form front and back, Mr. Ardell, and have your lawyer go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75998 - 2012-01-03
: Yes, ma’am. THE COURT: Did you read this form front and back, Mr. Ardell, and have your lawyer go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75998 - 2012-01-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
complaint to support your no[-]contest plea for first-degree reckless homicide?” Sutrick responded, “Yes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
complaint to support your no[-]contest plea for first-degree reckless homicide?” Sutrick responded, “Yes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
State v. Earl L. Diehl
was "overall" their understanding of the plea agreement and each answered yes. The court then engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9624 - 2017-09-19
was "overall" their understanding of the plea agreement and each answered yes. The court then engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9624 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Earl L. Diehl
was "overall" their understanding of the plea agreement and each answered yes. The court then engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9626 - 2017-09-19
was "overall" their understanding of the plea agreement and each answered yes. The court then engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9626 - 2017-09-19
State v. Laurie A. Koch
farm it? R. KOCH: Right. MONTGOMERY: Ok, and this was decided between the two of you? R. KOCH: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15560 - 2005-03-31
farm it? R. KOCH: Right. MONTGOMERY: Ok, and this was decided between the two of you? R. KOCH: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15560 - 2005-03-31