Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29201 - 29210 of 97586 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29201 - 29210 of 97586 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
court may decline to permit the case to go to the jury in the absence of expert testimony. Id. at 378
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98443 - 2013-06-24
court may decline to permit the case to go to the jury in the absence of expert testimony. Id. at 378
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98443 - 2013-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS
:30.” ¶6 The next day, July 16, when the court called the case, the prosecutor stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36279 - 2009-04-28
:30.” ¶6 The next day, July 16, when the court called the case, the prosecutor stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36279 - 2009-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The court then asked, “Understanding that Ms. Schneider is, it’s her office that’s handling this case, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70381 - 2011-08-29
.” The court then asked, “Understanding that Ms. Schneider is, it’s her office that’s handling this case, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70381 - 2011-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
to this case, in a prior court action concerning the assessor’s 2006 assessment of Lands’ End property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101878 - 2013-09-17
to this case, in a prior court action concerning the assessor’s 2006 assessment of Lands’ End property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101878 - 2013-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was no evidence in the school records which would be relevant to Bailey’s case. The trial court denied Bailey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29154 - 2007-06-26
that there was no evidence in the school records which would be relevant to Bailey’s case. The trial court denied Bailey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29154 - 2007-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
, as required by WEPA. However, the circuit court remanded the case to the DNR on the ground that the DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105813 - 2013-12-18
, as required by WEPA. However, the circuit court remanded the case to the DNR on the ground that the DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105813 - 2013-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
on the more pertinent prior cases, in the event this may prove helpful to the parties or to another court.[10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35369 - 2009-01-28
on the more pertinent prior cases, in the event this may prove helpful to the parties or to another court.[10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35369 - 2009-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
of the State’s case, the trial court denied Ihediwa’s motion to dismiss. Ihediwa presented several witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25
of the State’s case, the trial court denied Ihediwa’s motion to dismiss. Ihediwa presented several witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s order. ¶5 Even if Shaw had shown that she did not timely receive notice that the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97316 - 2013-05-28
court’s order. ¶5 Even if Shaw had shown that she did not timely receive notice that the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97316 - 2013-05-28
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89681 - 2012-12-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89681 - 2012-12-04