Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29201 - 29210 of 70067 for hi.
Search results 29201 - 29210 of 70067 for hi.
State v. Daniel Zembruski
contrary to §§ 961.14(4)(t) and 939.05, Stats., upon his guilty plea. On appeal, Zembruski challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13089 - 2005-03-31
contrary to §§ 961.14(4)(t) and 939.05, Stats., upon his guilty plea. On appeal, Zembruski challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13089 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
entered after revocation of his probation. He pled guilty on June 18, 2013, to one count of identity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122903 - 2014-09-29
entered after revocation of his probation. He pled guilty on June 18, 2013, to one count of identity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122903 - 2014-09-29
2008 WI APP 105
with misdemeanor disorderly conduct involving domestic abuse. Marinez grabbed his wife, pushed her out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33171 - 2008-07-29
with misdemeanor disorderly conduct involving domestic abuse. Marinez grabbed his wife, pushed her out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33171 - 2008-07-29
State v. Robert J. Brown
. § 346.63(1)(a). Brown contends that the criminal complaint did not factually establish his identity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6841 - 2005-03-31
. § 346.63(1)(a). Brown contends that the criminal complaint did not factually establish his identity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6841 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: Timothy M. Van Akkeren, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Following the denial of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30941 - 2007-11-20
: Timothy M. Van Akkeren, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Following the denial of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30941 - 2007-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
he’s on probation, his probation officer was notified and they placed a probation hold on him. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64172 - 2011-05-17
he’s on probation, his probation officer was notified and they placed a probation hold on him. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64172 - 2011-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction and an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Osinski argues to this court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19
of conviction and an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Osinski argues to this court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, his father, within the meaning of a statutory exception to the prohibition to underage drinking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09
, his father, within the meaning of a statutory exception to the prohibition to underage drinking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion with respect to the monetary sanction portion of his sentence. Because Cooper failed to file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09
discretion with respect to the monetary sanction portion of his sentence. Because Cooper failed to file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
and his parents then sued Paulson and State Farm, alleging, as material, that Paulson “negligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26607 - 2006-10-02
and his parents then sued Paulson and State Farm, alleging, as material, that Paulson “negligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26607 - 2006-10-02