Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29211 - 29220 of 97578 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29211 - 29220 of 97578 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2016 WI 1 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2014AP1048 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158691 - 2017-09-21
2016 WI 1 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2014AP1048 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158691 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that such circumstances were not present in this case. See id., ¶35 (citation omitted). He argues that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89091 - 2012-11-07
that such circumstances were not present in this case. See id., ¶35 (citation omitted). He argues that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89091 - 2012-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
court were correct in its application of that case, then “only the original motion could have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107616 - 2014-02-03
court were correct in its application of that case, then “only the original motion could have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107616 - 2014-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS
and in the circuit court, relied heavily on two unpublished cases. She also cited a third on appeal. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35267 - 2009-01-20
and in the circuit court, relied heavily on two unpublished cases. She also cited a third on appeal. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35267 - 2009-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37752 - 2009-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37752 - 2009-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
allegations had on Patterson. The court noted that “[t]his case had a history to it, and that history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92338 - 2013-01-30
allegations had on Patterson. The court noted that “[t]his case had a history to it, and that history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92338 - 2013-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
modification because the cases were not comparable. The court reasoned that because of differences between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122465 - 2014-09-24
modification because the cases were not comparable. The court reasoned that because of differences between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122465 - 2014-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
her absence had “absolutely no impact on the ultimate disposition of the case.” The court found trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49276 - 2010-04-22
her absence had “absolutely no impact on the ultimate disposition of the case.” The court found trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49276 - 2010-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS
is flawed: this is not a shirking case. ¶4 Our supreme court recently discussed shirking in Chen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30986 - 2007-11-27
is flawed: this is not a shirking case. ¶4 Our supreme court recently discussed shirking in Chen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30986 - 2007-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
to follow them in this case. Weaver’s premise that the court misunderstood the guidelines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147680 - 2015-08-30
to follow them in this case. Weaver’s premise that the court misunderstood the guidelines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147680 - 2015-08-30