Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29211 - 29220 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 29211 - 29220 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
daily as part of his duties. Erickson 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624226 - 2023-02-21
daily as part of his duties. Erickson 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624226 - 2023-02-21
[PDF]
State v. Mack A. Kradenych
was on duty on July 13, 1999, when he received a dispatch call of a possible burglary in progress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2713 - 2017-09-19
was on duty on July 13, 1999, when he received a dispatch call of a possible burglary in progress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2713 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
part satisfied the duties described in WIS. STAT. § 971.08, and State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195095 - 2017-09-21
part satisfied the duties described in WIS. STAT. § 971.08, and State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195095 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
not be perpetuated.”); State v. Disch, 119 Wis. 2d 461, 351 N.W.2d 492 (1984) (“No duty devolves upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26788 - 2014-09-15
not be perpetuated.”); State v. Disch, 119 Wis. 2d 461, 351 N.W.2d 492 (1984) (“No duty devolves upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26788 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 18
, it is the duty of this court to take notice of its jurisdiction, notwithstanding the fact that no party has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208487 - 2018-04-09
, it is the duty of this court to take notice of its jurisdiction, notwithstanding the fact that no party has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208487 - 2018-04-09
[PDF]
Charles A. Poindexter II v. Pamela J. Kagan
to enforce that judgment. In proceedings concerning custody and physical placement the trial court’s duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15079 - 2017-09-21
to enforce that judgment. In proceedings concerning custody and physical placement the trial court’s duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15079 - 2017-09-21
State v. David V. Pugh, Sr.
. He testified as follows. On March 2, 2003, at 1:20 a.m. he was on duty in Readstown, Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7538 - 2005-03-31
. He testified as follows. On March 2, 2003, at 1:20 a.m. he was on duty in Readstown, Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7538 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, or both, or you are suspected of driving or being on duty time with respect to a commercial motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28783 - 2007-04-23
, or both, or you are suspected of driving or being on duty time with respect to a commercial motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28783 - 2007-04-23
City of Madison v. John M. Virnig
testified as follows. While on duty at 2:00 a.m., June 20, 1995, he saw a pickup truck parked partially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12326 - 2005-03-31
testified as follows. While on duty at 2:00 a.m., June 20, 1995, he saw a pickup truck parked partially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12326 - 2005-03-31
Torger Mikkelson v. Trempealeau Marina Inc.
and therefore received no benefit. However, the trial court found that Rober owed a duty to Mikkelson based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15868 - 2005-03-31
and therefore received no benefit. However, the trial court found that Rober owed a duty to Mikkelson based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15868 - 2005-03-31