Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29211 - 29220 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 29211 - 29220 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
State v. Zong Lor
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that counsel performed ineffectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3124 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that counsel performed ineffectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3124 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven C.
claimed privacy interest. This appeal followed. Standard of Review ¶6 This case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5050 - 2017-09-19
claimed privacy interest. This appeal followed. Standard of Review ¶6 This case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5050 - 2017-09-19
Waushara County v. Jean K. D.
to be administered to her, regardless of her consent, during the period of the commitment. Jean claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18395 - 2005-06-01
to be administered to her, regardless of her consent, during the period of the commitment. Jean claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18395 - 2005-06-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
defendant. ¶8 On appeal, Green reiterates his claim that the circuit court considered inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69080 - 2014-09-15
defendant. ¶8 On appeal, Green reiterates his claim that the circuit court considered inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69080 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kendrick C. East III
on October 29, 2002, claiming that the case should be dismissed for noncompliance with his prompt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6365 - 2017-09-19
on October 29, 2002, claiming that the case should be dismissed for noncompliance with his prompt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6365 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be no arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when ruling
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640497 - 2023-04-05
be no arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when ruling
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640497 - 2023-04-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on this discovery, Secura claimed that Dandy Veal had violated a provision of its policy prohibiting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160448 - 2017-09-21
on this discovery, Secura claimed that Dandy Veal had violated a provision of its policy prohibiting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160448 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). Any claim that trial counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189004 - 2017-09-21
.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). Any claim that trial counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189004 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
forfeited his claim. See State v. Ndina, 2009 WI 21, ¶30, 315 Wis. 2d 653, 761 N.W.2d 612 (“mere failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197121 - 2017-09-26
forfeited his claim. See State v. Ndina, 2009 WI 21, ¶30, 315 Wis. 2d 653, 761 N.W.2d 612 (“mere failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197121 - 2017-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
or acquiescence by the party asserting laches that a claim for relief was forthcoming; and (3) prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31964 - 2008-02-27
or acquiescence by the party asserting laches that a claim for relief was forthcoming; and (3) prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31964 - 2008-02-27