Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29221 - 29230 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 29221 - 29230 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a suppression motion challenging his seizure and arrest. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141771 - 2017-09-21
filed a suppression motion challenging his seizure and arrest. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141771 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, and from an order denying his motion for resentencing.[1] Curtis asserts the sentencing court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49246 - 2010-04-26
, and from an order denying his motion for resentencing.[1] Curtis asserts the sentencing court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49246 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as untimely the State’s motion to introduce the findings of the garbage “pulls” as other acts evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194599 - 2017-09-21
as untimely the State’s motion to introduce the findings of the garbage “pulls” as other acts evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194599 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael J. Burgus
Kelley moved the court to withdraw. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8667 - 2005-03-31
Kelley moved the court to withdraw. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8667 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because the arresting officer lacked reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33484 - 2008-07-28
the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because the arresting officer lacked reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33484 - 2008-07-28
James Wiechmann v. Colin Ilsley
for our review—whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by granting Schreiber's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8111 - 2005-03-31
for our review—whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by granting Schreiber's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8111 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gail M. Washington v. Melvin K. Washington
denying her postdivorce motion to award her interest and appreciation from the date of divorce until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13956 - 2014-09-15
denying her postdivorce motion to award her interest and appreciation from the date of divorce until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13956 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are not permitted to grant that relief unless the respondent files a separate motion seeking that relief. Howell
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288841 - 2020-09-17
are not permitted to grant that relief unless the respondent files a separate motion seeking that relief. Howell
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288841 - 2020-09-17
CA Blank Order
in the no-merit report. The time for Mathe to file a postconviction motion under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131951 - 2014-12-22
in the no-merit report. The time for Mathe to file a postconviction motion under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131951 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Mikkel J. Goff
and order denying his postconviction motion. The main issue is whether the court erred by allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4169 - 2017-09-20
and order denying his postconviction motion. The main issue is whether the court erred by allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4169 - 2017-09-20