Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29221 - 29230 of 97578 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29221 - 29230 of 97578 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 12, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71891 - 2011-10-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 12, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71891 - 2011-10-11
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 28, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 28, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27
COURT OF APPEALS
on the doctrine of issue preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135116 - 2015-02-17
on the doctrine of issue preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135116 - 2015-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 26, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35979 - 2009-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 26, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35979 - 2009-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s order in the present case was not made pursuant to any of these three traditional areas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32770 - 2008-05-21
court’s order in the present case was not made pursuant to any of these three traditional areas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32770 - 2008-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
The court sentenced Finley as follows: “I am going to impose the maximum sentence in this case. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109016 - 2014-03-17
The court sentenced Finley as follows: “I am going to impose the maximum sentence in this case. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109016 - 2014-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
instruction, under the particular facts of this case, misled the jury. The Proegler court expressed a concern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31105 - 2007-12-11
instruction, under the particular facts of this case, misled the jury. The Proegler court expressed a concern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31105 - 2007-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 25, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108271 - 2014-02-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 25, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108271 - 2014-02-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 1300. The court explained that in reaching a decision in a case on the merits, a judge may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95946 - 2013-04-24
. at 1300. The court explained that in reaching a decision in a case on the merits, a judge may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95946 - 2013-04-24
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 10, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134835 - 2015-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 10, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134835 - 2015-02-09