Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29231 - 29240 of 64600 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 29231 - 29240 of 64600 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by denying the motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, Nos. 2019AP2113-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307313 - 2020-11-24
by denying the motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, Nos. 2019AP2113-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307313 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
attorney appropriately counseled his plea. The court denied the motion. It stated that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36850 - 2014-09-15
attorney appropriately counseled his plea. The court denied the motion. It stated that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36850 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143491 - 2017-09-21
has not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143491 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Beverly Halverson v. PDQ Food Stores, Inc.
to be a part of the record on summary judgment. In the deposition, Beverly was asked and she answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14531 - 2017-09-21
to be a part of the record on summary judgment. In the deposition, Beverly was asked and she answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14531 - 2017-09-21
Certification
the DNA surcharge under Wis. Stat. § 973.046(1g), must state on the record its reasoning for imposing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40876 - 2009-09-15
the DNA surcharge under Wis. Stat. § 973.046(1g), must state on the record its reasoning for imposing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40876 - 2009-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but followed the parties’ recommendation and withheld sentence “given the record now before this Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130022 - 2017-09-21
, but followed the parties’ recommendation and withheld sentence “given the record now before this Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130022 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
attorney discussed the evidence presented at trial, pointed out that Harris’s past record was not violent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608438 - 2023-01-10
attorney discussed the evidence presented at trial, pointed out that Harris’s past record was not violent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608438 - 2023-01-10
COURT OF APPEALS
recommendation. During the postconviction motion hearing, the court observed: [T]he record is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40935 - 2009-09-14
recommendation. During the postconviction motion hearing, the court observed: [T]he record is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40935 - 2009-09-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2018AP119 4 Nevertheless, Menard argues “his pleadings, interrogatory answer, and medical records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238083 - 2019-03-26
. No. 2018AP119 4 Nevertheless, Menard argues “his pleadings, interrogatory answer, and medical records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238083 - 2019-03-26
CA Blank Order
then filed a supplemental response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Falls’ responses, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142472 - 2015-05-26
then filed a supplemental response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Falls’ responses, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142472 - 2015-05-26