Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29241 - 29250 of 63539 for records.

Nancy L. DeWitt v. Edward L. Jones
to this farm.[5] As to 2 through 6, we have reviewed the record and are satisfied that these findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11509 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Frank Jude Steffes
In his brief, he misrepresents the record when he asserts that at the intersection of Vista Road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6232 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] David J. Hoffman v. J. Daniel Benson
of record. 1 David observes that neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10277 - 2017-09-20

LBY and Associates, Inc. v. Warren Lee Brandt
, it appears from the record that on the day the circuit court granted Brandt's motion to reopen, it signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15916 - 2005-03-31

State v. Susan Holzl
, 216 Wis.2d 61, 80, 573 N.W.2d 888, 897 (Ct. App. 1997). The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13333 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the issue were that simple. But the record is muddy and that which appears to be simple ends up being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35702 - 2009-03-03

Darla L. Gebhard v. Kelvin G. Gebhard
a rational, reasoned decision and applies the correct legal standard to the facts of record. Sellers v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4437 - 2005-03-31

School District of Waukesha v. School District Boundary Appeal Board
was appealed by the residents to the SDBAB. The SDBAB received a written record and heard presentations from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8854 - 2005-03-31

State v. James Perkins
of the record. We now review the report as it affects each of the named witnesses, and as their proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15210 - 2005-05-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, or if the Record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the circuit court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82109 - 2014-09-15