Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29251 - 29260 of 44429 for name change.

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Barnes
the trial court’s denial of sentence modification because we agree that the change in Henger’s assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13395 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
changed in more than a decade. The Neunaber report does not challenge Dr. Peterson’s conclusion from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252390 - 2020-01-15

State v. Ahmad Abdullah
in the street. Abdullah apparently changed his story again, stating that he was shot down the street. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11544 - 2005-03-31

Terri A. Birt v. Anne Marie Bonkowski
changed. Id. at 351. ¶9 We exercise our discretion to apply the doctrine of judicial estoppel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5345 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jon Firehammer v. Nancy Marchant
on the matter. This the court granted. However, the court did not change its position on the intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13685 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Gary Curtis
to be the law in Wisconsin, but the law had changed by the time the 1993 recordings were entered into evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11531 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
to and did reach the user or consumer without substantial change in the condition it was when it was sold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32586 - 2008-05-07

COURT OF APPEALS
that this was boilerplate language that she had inadvertently not changed and that it had no connection to the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49412 - 2010-04-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
might rely on new evidence to make an entirely new argument, or to change emphasis among arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161755 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
arguments regarding a motion to dismiss, a motion to change the special verdict answer and a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41405 - 2009-09-23