Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29261 - 29270 of 46217 for adulte name change.

Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
change”; and that the plaintiffs, who were incumbent classified employees, had been appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11968 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gustavo Hinojosa
expert would have changed the outcome of his trial.4 See id. (to establish prejudice, “[a] defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14582 - 2017-09-21

State v. DeWayne E. Goodwin
,” and that the investigator had read it back to Sirois and allowed him to make any changes. Sirois reiterated during his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15334 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, is not contradictory to the mother’s recollection and as such, Matthew’s testimony would likely have not changed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29129 - 2007-05-21

Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
change”; and that the plaintiffs, who were incumbent classified employees, had been appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11359 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
concerned for Alicia A.’s well-being because Angie A. was not changing her diapers or feeding her properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92968 - 2013-02-19

[PDF] NOTICE
deemed frivolous, and that an attorney cannot change the law short of challenging its constitutionality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59523 - 2014-09-15

Alfred A. Zealy v. City of Waukesha
, 1985, the City changed the zoning on approximately 28.6 acres of land in the City from R-1 to C-1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16878 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thomas R. Galecke
what is now § 302.45, supports this interpretation: Proposed changes: This proposal creates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18817 - 2017-09-21

State v. Gustavo Hinojosa
, or that the opinion of an independent expert would have changed the outcome of his trial.[4] See id. (to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14582 - 2005-03-31