Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29261 - 29270 of 62779 for child support.
Search results 29261 - 29270 of 62779 for child support.
[PDF]
Joan M. Kudlick v. James E. Bivens
, not the appellate court, to determine. See id. at 172. We review the record to locate evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7359 - 2017-09-20
, not the appellate court, to determine. See id. at 172. We review the record to locate evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7359 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ralph Ovadal
are not supported by the evidence; (2) his conduct constituted speech protected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6152 - 2017-09-19
are not supported by the evidence; (2) his conduct constituted speech protected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6152 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confidential informants included in the report supported the allegations in the report. Kalafi challenged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004235 - 2025-09-05
confidential informants included in the report supported the allegations in the report. Kalafi challenged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004235 - 2025-09-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not supported by the evidence. We agree the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130755 - 2017-09-21
was not supported by the evidence. We agree the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130755 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Demetrius Newman
the jury regarding Bridges’s conviction; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to support Newman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13946 - 2014-09-15
the jury regarding Bridges’s conviction; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to support Newman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13946 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
have supported a motion for plea withdrawal, and that his trial lawyer was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50752 - 2014-09-15
have supported a motion for plea withdrawal, and that his trial lawyer was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50752 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, he moved for plea withdrawal. Lopez cited unspecified “new evidence” in support of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34835 - 2014-09-15
, he moved for plea withdrawal. Lopez cited unspecified “new evidence” in support of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34835 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
presented insufficient evidence to support the guilty verdicts; (4) the trial court improperly allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33590 - 2008-08-04
presented insufficient evidence to support the guilty verdicts; (4) the trial court improperly allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33590 - 2008-08-04
COURT OF APPEALS
in an effort to support Collison’s position that his property had no market value. The City’s assessor also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121184 - 2014-09-08
in an effort to support Collison’s position that his property had no market value. The City’s assessor also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121184 - 2014-09-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that governed the first petition. Adam does not cite any case law or statutory authority directly supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257655 - 2020-04-14
that governed the first petition. Adam does not cite any case law or statutory authority directly supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257655 - 2020-04-14