Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29261 - 29270 of 30191 for de.
Search results 29261 - 29270 of 30191 for de.
Frontsheet
interpretation. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo but benefiting from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36011 - 2009-03-25
interpretation. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo but benefiting from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36011 - 2009-03-25
Frontsheet
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Sorenson, 2000 WI 43, ¶15, 234 Wis. 2d 648, 611 N.W.2d 240
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33413 - 2008-07-14
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Sorenson, 2000 WI 43, ¶15, 234 Wis. 2d 648, 611 N.W.2d 240
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33413 - 2008-07-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as to the defendant’s guilt.” Id. This reasonable-probability issue presents a question of law for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177979 - 2017-09-21
as to the defendant’s guilt.” Id. This reasonable-probability issue presents a question of law for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177979 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 94
they are clearly erroneous. Id. Second, we review de novo whether those facts constitute reasonable suspicion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33410 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous. Id. Second, we review de novo whether those facts constitute reasonable suspicion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33410 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 31
of law that this court reviews de novo while benefitting from the analyses of the lower courts. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95234 - 2014-09-15
of law that this court reviews de novo while benefitting from the analyses of the lower courts. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95234 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Leonard J. Harvey
of a penalty enhancer in a criminal case. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16359 - 2017-09-21
of a penalty enhancer in a criminal case. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16359 - 2017-09-21
State v. Leonard J. Harvey
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Howard, 211 Wis. 2d 269, 277, 564 N.W.2d 753 (1997
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16359 - 2005-03-31
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Howard, 211 Wis. 2d 269, 277, 564 N.W.2d 753 (1997
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16359 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
HMO-W Incorporated v. SSM Health Care System
of statutory interpretation that we resolve de novo. Thielman v. Leean, 2003 WI App 33, ¶6, 260 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4804 - 2017-09-20
of statutory interpretation that we resolve de novo. Thielman v. Leean, 2003 WI App 33, ¶6, 260 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4804 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Tommy G. Thompson v. Terrance L. Craney
provisions of the Wisconsin Constitution de novo. Polk County v. State Pub. Defender, 188 Wis. 2d 665
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17048 - 2017-09-21
provisions of the Wisconsin Constitution de novo. Polk County v. State Pub. Defender, 188 Wis. 2d 665
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17048 - 2017-09-21
State v. David M. Murrell
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12641 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12641 - 2005-03-31