Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29271 - 29280 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 29271 - 29280 of 83455 for simple case search.
State v. Robert Fecke
, in the case of a prison, is guilty of a Class I felony. Fecke argues that the State failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5366 - 2005-03-31
, in the case of a prison, is guilty of a Class I felony. Fecke argues that the State failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5366 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sandy J. Claude
look as to whether or not there is indeed a refusal in this case, because I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6514 - 2005-03-31
look as to whether or not there is indeed a refusal in this case, because I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Gundrum, JJ. In these consolidated cases, Glenn A. Purlee appeals from three judgments of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110217 - 2017-09-21
and Gundrum, JJ. In these consolidated cases, Glenn A. Purlee appeals from three judgments of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110217 - 2017-09-21
State v. Orlander Isabell
be prima facie evidence of fraud in any such case. Further, § 49.12(1) provides: Any person who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9014 - 2005-03-31
be prima facie evidence of fraud in any such case. Further, § 49.12(1) provides: Any person who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9014 - 2005-03-31
State v. Guillermo Gutierrez
that the prosecution in this case violated his double jeopardy protection. Like the trial court, we reject Gutierrez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5982 - 2005-03-31
that the prosecution in this case violated his double jeopardy protection. Like the trial court, we reject Gutierrez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5982 - 2005-03-31
State v. Delano L. Terrell
2006 WI App 166 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1499-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25920 - 2006-08-29
2006 WI App 166 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1499-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25920 - 2006-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
about half of those and then our – my work unit supervisor assigns cases at random. So we see about 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31247 - 2007-12-17
about half of those and then our – my work unit supervisor assigns cases at random. So we see about 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31247 - 2007-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
of that case. Kwick argues, just as Colby did, that Wis. Stat. § 893.13(2) tolled the statute of limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103690 - 2013-11-04
of that case. Kwick argues, just as Colby did, that Wis. Stat. § 893.13(2) tolled the statute of limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103690 - 2013-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007064 - 2025-09-11
of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007064 - 2025-09-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
McWashington had to “choose between representation or presenting the full case as [he saw] it.” McWashington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357941 - 2021-04-20
McWashington had to “choose between representation or presenting the full case as [he saw] it.” McWashington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357941 - 2021-04-20