Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29271 - 29280 of 83478 for simple case search.
Search results 29271 - 29280 of 83478 for simple case search.
State v. Robert Fecke
, in the case of a prison, is guilty of a Class I felony. Fecke argues that the State failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5366 - 2005-03-31
, in the case of a prison, is guilty of a Class I felony. Fecke argues that the State failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5366 - 2005-03-31
State v. Guillermo Gutierrez
that the prosecution in this case violated his double jeopardy protection. Like the trial court, we reject Gutierrez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5982 - 2005-03-31
that the prosecution in this case violated his double jeopardy protection. Like the trial court, we reject Gutierrez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5982 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert Fecke
. No. 02-1598-CR 3 the … warden or superintendent of the prison, in the case of a prison, is guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5366 - 2017-09-19
. No. 02-1598-CR 3 the … warden or superintendent of the prison, in the case of a prison, is guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5366 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Guillermo Gutierrez
to a charge of retail theft as a repeat offender. Gutierrez claims that the prosecution in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5982 - 2017-09-19
to a charge of retail theft as a repeat offender. Gutierrez claims that the prosecution in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5982 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dorian H.
. App. 1991). Under these cases, the fact that Siebert's testimony did not go into detail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9278 - 2017-09-19
. App. 1991). Under these cases, the fact that Siebert's testimony did not go into detail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9278 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. Lasanske addressed all of the cases Seuell cited in his brief. ¶7 The State’s brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125310 - 2014-10-27
in this case. Lasanske addressed all of the cases Seuell cited in his brief. ¶7 The State’s brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125310 - 2014-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in his case. He further contends that his sentence was unduly harsh. We reject Wilcher’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308953 - 2020-12-02
in his case. He further contends that his sentence was unduly harsh. We reject Wilcher’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308953 - 2020-12-02
State v. Frank J. Obuchowski
in this case. We also hold that the “reasonable purpose” of Quartana was satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15219 - 2005-03-31
in this case. We also hold that the “reasonable purpose” of Quartana was satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15219 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony A. Parker
2001 WI App 111 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2673 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 111 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2673 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
months after Seuell filed his appellate brief in this case. Lasanske addressed all of the cases Seuell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125310 - 2017-09-21
months after Seuell filed his appellate brief in this case. Lasanske addressed all of the cases Seuell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125310 - 2017-09-21