Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29291 - 29300 of 58950 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
there is any arguable merit to a claim challenging the sentence imposed; and whether the court properly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244067 - 2019-07-24

[PDF] Frank Musa v. Jefferson County Bank
, alleging numerous claims. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7744 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
on that form, and is not now claiming otherwise. See State v. Moederndorfer, 141 Wis. 2d 823, 827-28, 416
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977228 - 2025-07-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
claim of self- defense “[did] not fully capture all of the facts of this case.” This appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22

Ellen M. Gleason v. Richard J. Gleason
to the property division in a divorce proceeding. Gleason claims the trial court’s calculations were erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5162 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
reason for failing to raise this new claim in his earlier postconviction motion. The State also argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01

State v. Ronald M. Vales
the credit union. She claimed that she had told police that the men "robbed drug dealers." Henry claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10065 - 2005-03-31

Letrillian's, Inc. v. Patrick C. Miller
claims that whether the defendants breached a contract to procure replacement-cost coverage and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9241 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kenneth L. Hooverson, Jr.
relief. Hooverson claims there is insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14705 - 2017-09-21

William Trombello v. Blue Sky Harbor Limited Partnership
. Stat. § 100.18, and conversion. The Trombellos claim that the defendants violated the condominium
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3526 - 2005-03-31