Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29291 - 29300 of 63219 for records.
Search results 29291 - 29300 of 63219 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the arrest. The court reviewed a recording of Goines’s police interrogation and heard police testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979187 - 2025-07-08
the arrest. The court reviewed a recording of Goines’s police interrogation and heard police testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979187 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47225 - 2014-09-15
by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47225 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dentist who would agree to review the Bright Dental records and provide an opinion as to the treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516405 - 2022-05-03
dentist who would agree to review the Bright Dental records and provide an opinion as to the treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516405 - 2022-05-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case, Baker’s prior record, and Baker’s outburst at the close of his first sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107365 - 2017-09-21
of the case, Baker’s prior record, and Baker’s outburst at the close of his first sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107365 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Derrick A. Stevens
stated motive, because that conclusion was not supported by the record. Because Stevens was not denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18443 - 2017-09-21
stated motive, because that conclusion was not supported by the record. Because Stevens was not denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18443 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
response, and a review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485574 - 2022-02-22
response, and a review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485574 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
Philip T. Sliwinski v. The Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of the City of Milwaukee
1 There is nothing in the Record to indicate that the person who let Bonilla and Velasquez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21576 - 2017-09-21
1 There is nothing in the Record to indicate that the person who let Bonilla and Velasquez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21576 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 137
WISCONSIN STAT. § 82.31(1) concerns “recorded” highways. It reads: Any recorded highway that has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103500 - 2017-09-21
WISCONSIN STAT. § 82.31(1) concerns “recorded” highways. It reads: Any recorded highway that has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103500 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the record to review arguments unaccompanied by adequate record citations; appellate court will accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118461 - 2014-07-28
the record to review arguments unaccompanied by adequate record citations; appellate court will accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118461 - 2014-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the record, we cannot rule that the trial court’s finding was clearly erroneous. There were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29776 - 2007-07-23
review of the record, we cannot rule that the trial court’s finding was clearly erroneous. There were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29776 - 2007-07-23