Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29291 - 29300 of 42967 for t o.
Search results 29291 - 29300 of 42967 for t o.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to deny a presentence motion for plea withdrawal is discretionary, and “[t]he defendant has the burden
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165018 - 2017-09-21
to deny a presentence motion for plea withdrawal is discretionary, and “[t]he defendant has the burden
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165018 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234014 - 2019-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234014 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422418 - 2021-09-08
809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422418 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
834. “[T]he crucial test is whether, taking into account all of the circumstances surrounding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108336 - 2017-09-21
834. “[T]he crucial test is whether, taking into account all of the circumstances surrounding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108336 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Kimber
of the testimony was relevant. Regarding the police officers, the trial court reasoned: “[T]he fact that police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9613 - 2017-09-19
of the testimony was relevant. Regarding the police officers, the trial court reasoned: “[T]he fact that police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9613 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for punishment, stating that “[i]t is a prison case” in light of Radford’s “reckless[ness],” the loss of life
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766224 - 2024-02-20
for punishment, stating that “[i]t is a prison case” in light of Radford’s “reckless[ness],” the loss of life
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766224 - 2024-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 373 (“[T]he mandatory DNA surcharge statute does not have a punitive effect. Accordingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716538 - 2023-10-17
N.W.2d 373 (“[T]he mandatory DNA surcharge statute does not have a punitive effect. Accordingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716538 - 2023-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
... for the refusal”). “[T]he power to dismiss is a discretionary one” and whether the decision to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90208 - 2012-12-05
... for the refusal”). “[T]he power to dismiss is a discretionary one” and whether the decision to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90208 - 2012-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
court for La Crosse County: dale t. pasell, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101402 - 2013-08-28
court for La Crosse County: dale t. pasell, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101402 - 2013-08-28
CA Blank Order
District IV/III December 16, 2014 To: Hon. Richard T. Werner Circuit Court Judge Rock Co
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131833 - 2014-12-15
District IV/III December 16, 2014 To: Hon. Richard T. Werner Circuit Court Judge Rock Co
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131833 - 2014-12-15