Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 15282 for 2013.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 15282 for 2013.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm for the reasons discussed below
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164060 - 2017-09-21
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm for the reasons discussed below
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164060 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136732 - 2015-03-03
as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136732 - 2015-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm. Quinn
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157540 - 2017-09-21
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm. Quinn
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157540 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168990 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168990 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Andritsch’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138503 - 2017-09-21
. Andritsch’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138503 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We deny
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182073 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We deny
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182073 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
otherwise noted. [2] The record contains a status conference transcript dated November 14, 2013—four months
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113217 - 2014-06-03
otherwise noted. [2] The record contains a status conference transcript dated November 14, 2013—four months
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113217 - 2014-06-03
CA Blank Order
disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We summarily affirm. Barnes was convicted, after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138449 - 2015-03-23
disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We summarily affirm. Barnes was convicted, after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138449 - 2015-03-23
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 (2013-14).[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144241 - 2015-07-06
. § 974.06 (2013-14).[1] Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144241 - 2015-07-06
CA Blank Order
counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136720 - 2015-03-10
counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136720 - 2015-03-10