Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
then made a joint recommendation—in conjunction with the entry of a plea and deferred entry of judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595333 - 2022-11-29
then made a joint recommendation—in conjunction with the entry of a plea and deferred entry of judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595333 - 2022-11-29
State v. Donald Mentzel
a defendant who is placed on straight probation with sentence withheld is “in custody under sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12661 - 2005-03-31
a defendant who is placed on straight probation with sentence withheld is “in custody under sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Darnell Jackson
denying his motion for additional sentence credit. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7852 - 2017-09-19
denying his motion for additional sentence credit. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7852 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
court concluded was consensual. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27555 - 2006-12-26
court concluded was consensual. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27555 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
equivalent to the original complaint. ¶3 The defendants filed a joint motion to dismiss the amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251235 - 2019-12-12
equivalent to the original complaint. ¶3 The defendants filed a joint motion to dismiss the amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251235 - 2019-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel L. Zitlow
. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4009 - 2017-09-20
. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4009 - 2017-09-20
State v. Gabriel L. Zitlow
of marijuana as a party to the crime. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4009 - 2005-03-31
of marijuana as a party to the crime. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4009 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James L. Blackburn
, this motion was not sent through the official having custody over Blackburn and was not accompanied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12090 - 2017-09-21
, this motion was not sent through the official having custody over Blackburn and was not accompanied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12090 - 2017-09-21
State v. James L. Blackburn
County Clerk of Courts filed this “Motion to Dismiss ‘Warrant’” letter on June 16, 1995. In this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12090 - 2005-03-31
County Clerk of Courts filed this “Motion to Dismiss ‘Warrant’” letter on June 16, 1995. In this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12090 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 13
not support a pro rata allocation of damages. I. FACTS ¶5 Prior to filing motions for summary judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35384 - 2014-09-15
not support a pro rata allocation of damages. I. FACTS ¶5 Prior to filing motions for summary judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35384 - 2014-09-15