Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 16451 for commenting.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 16451 for commenting.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the sentencing court’s comments about Graham’s mandatory release date were not inaccurate and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34908 - 2008-12-22
that the sentencing court’s comments about Graham’s mandatory release date were not inaccurate and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34908 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
, the prosecutor commented that he didn’t think “there’s a single kind of crime … that [Cunningham] hasn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19
, the prosecutor commented that he didn’t think “there’s a single kind of crime … that [Cunningham] hasn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court failed to consider mitigating comments he made in his allocution. ¶4 Copley began his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68842 - 2014-09-15
the court failed to consider mitigating comments he made in his allocution. ¶4 Copley began his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68842 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brook E. Grzelak
. Judge Greenwood concluded that Judge Dilweg’s sentencing comments indicated reliance on parole policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15835 - 2017-09-21
. Judge Greenwood concluded that Judge Dilweg’s sentencing comments indicated reliance on parole policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15835 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael W. Fink
that is a fair comment on the evidence. See State v. Amundson, 69 Wis.2d 554, 572, 230 N.W.2d 775, 785 (1975
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9372 - 2005-06-29
that is a fair comment on the evidence. See State v. Amundson, 69 Wis.2d 554, 572, 230 N.W.2d 775, 785 (1975
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9372 - 2005-06-29
[PDF]
May a judge meet in chambers with a representative of a special interest group without violating the Code of Judicial Ethics?
Judicial Conduct Advisory Committee 2 The purpose of the rule is stated in the amended comment
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885 - 2017-09-20
Judicial Conduct Advisory Committee 2 The purpose of the rule is stated in the amended comment
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885 - 2017-09-20
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
/supreme/sc_hearing_rules.jsp. The court's file already contains all comments and responses filed to date
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=158&year=2010
/supreme/sc_hearing_rules.jsp. The court's file already contains all comments and responses filed to date
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=158&year=2010
[PDF]
NOTICE
court approved circuit court’s approach at resentencing: adopting comments from original sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51347 - 2014-09-15
court approved circuit court’s approach at resentencing: adopting comments from original sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51347 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
that the court disregard Walker’s letter; and (3) whether the court’s comments at the initial sentencing hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95391 - 2013-04-15
that the court disregard Walker’s letter; and (3) whether the court’s comments at the initial sentencing hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95391 - 2013-04-15
Wisconsin Court System - Supreme Court Rules - Petition archive
Description Feb 07, 2014 Comments and exhibits from William J. Keefe Feb 07, 2014 Comments from William J
/scrules/archive/1312.htm - 2026-02-12
Description Feb 07, 2014 Comments and exhibits from William J. Keefe Feb 07, 2014 Comments from William J
/scrules/archive/1312.htm - 2026-02-12