Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 68326 for did.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 68326 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), arguing that the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111776 - 2014-05-06
a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), arguing that the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111776 - 2014-05-06
City of Sheboygan v. Korry L. Ardell
Court entered into by his attorney of record. Ardell argues that because he did not sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19570 - 2005-09-13
Court entered into by his attorney of record. Ardell argues that because he did not sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19570 - 2005-09-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
did not understand one of the elements of the crime to which he pled. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27777 - 2014-09-15
did not understand one of the elements of the crime to which he pled. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27777 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
) postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to argue the circuit court did not inform Profit of all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95542 - 2014-01-27
) postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to argue the circuit court did not inform Profit of all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95542 - 2014-01-27
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - November 2020
and defense counsel testified. The court found that counsel did not tell Savage he had a defense “because
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304602 - 2020-11-11
and defense counsel testified. The court found that counsel did not tell Savage he had a defense “because
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304602 - 2020-11-11
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
(WPDES) permit? Did DNR retain discretion to decide whether to impose certain permit conditions after
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275407 - 2020-07-31
(WPDES) permit? Did DNR retain discretion to decide whether to impose certain permit conditions after
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275407 - 2020-07-31
[PDF]
for the Bennetts and Kwik Trip (collectively, “Respondents”), concluding that S&L did not timely exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860665 - 2024-10-10
for the Bennetts and Kwik Trip (collectively, “Respondents”), concluding that S&L did not timely exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860665 - 2024-10-10
COURT OF APPEALS
testified. Figueroa did not testify. ¶5 Vele was an employee in the sensitive crimes unit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104993 - 2013-12-02
testified. Figueroa did not testify. ¶5 Vele was an employee in the sensitive crimes unit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104993 - 2013-12-02
COURT OF APPEALS
; (2) finding that Michael did not waste marital assets; (3) holding open, but not setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136570 - 2015-03-09
; (2) finding that Michael did not waste marital assets; (3) holding open, but not setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136570 - 2015-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissing Lowe’s complaints, the circuit court determined that Lowe’s did not overcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397273 - 2021-07-28
and dismissing Lowe’s complaints, the circuit court determined that Lowe’s did not overcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397273 - 2021-07-28