Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 7582 for ye.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 7582 for ye.
[PDF]
State v. Earl L. Diehl
was "overall" their understanding of the plea agreement and each answered yes. The court then engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9625 - 2017-09-19
was "overall" their understanding of the plea agreement and each answered yes. The court then engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9625 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“yes” by the court because the State did not prove that answer by clear and convincing evidence; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165627 - 2017-09-21
“yes” by the court because the State did not prove that answer by clear and convincing evidence; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165627 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald D. Shampo
the charges and penalties, to which Shampo replied, “Yes.” ¶11 The court explained that a no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6071 - 2017-09-19
the charges and penalties, to which Shampo replied, “Yes.” ¶11 The court explained that a no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6071 - 2017-09-19
Certification
during the ride, Edler asked Urban, “can my attorney be present for this?” and Urban answered, “yes he
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89305 - 2012-11-13
during the ride, Edler asked Urban, “can my attorney be present for this?” and Urban answered, “yes he
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89305 - 2012-11-13
[PDF]
State v. Earl L. Diehl
was "overall" their understanding of the plea agreement and each answered yes. The court then engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9627 - 2017-09-19
was "overall" their understanding of the plea agreement and each answered yes. The court then engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9627 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert Koch
farm it? R. KOCH: Right. MONTGOMERY: Ok, and this was decided between the two of you? R. KOCH: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15823 - 2005-03-31
farm it? R. KOCH: Right. MONTGOMERY: Ok, and this was decided between the two of you? R. KOCH: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15823 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that [the officers] came in [to the cell], correct? A: Yes. Q: And then what happened in your mind? A: We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87550 - 2014-09-15
that [the officers] came in [to the cell], correct? A: Yes. Q: And then what happened in your mind? A: We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87550 - 2014-09-15
Shawn Carlson v. Frank B. Gleichsner
working? A: (By Carlson) Yes. You said that if you get the part, bring it in, it was a simple $15 part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7529 - 2005-03-31
working? A: (By Carlson) Yes. You said that if you get the part, bring it in, it was a simple $15 part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7529 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig R. Nelson
? Therefore, maybe it is admissible on that basis. …. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Your Honor, yes, I believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21048 - 2017-09-21
? Therefore, maybe it is admissible on that basis. …. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Your Honor, yes, I believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21048 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 30
explained that Officer Erickson asked me, did you see that too? And I said yes, I saw the swerving. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46000 - 2014-09-15
explained that Officer Erickson asked me, did you see that too? And I said yes, I saw the swerving. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46000 - 2014-09-15