Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 7582 for ye.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 7582 for ye.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
complaint to support your no[-]contest plea for first-degree reckless homicide?” Sutrick responded, “Yes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
complaint to support your no[-]contest plea for first-degree reckless homicide?” Sutrick responded, “Yes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
complaint to support your no[-]contest plea for first-degree reckless homicide?” Sutrick responded, “Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
complaint to support your no[-]contest plea for first-degree reckless homicide?” Sutrick responded, “Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
: Yes, ma’am. THE COURT: Did you read this form front and back, Mr. Ardell, and have your lawyer go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75998 - 2012-01-03
: Yes, ma’am. THE COURT: Did you read this form front and back, Mr. Ardell, and have your lawyer go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75998 - 2012-01-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that yes, he had all these opportunities and yes, he squandered them and that leads to consequences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241830 - 2019-06-11
that yes, he had all these opportunities and yes, he squandered them and that leads to consequences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241830 - 2019-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
this knife at you; right? A. Yes. Zurkowski was also asked what June did with the knife: “She just held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51165 - 2010-06-21
this knife at you; right? A. Yes. Zurkowski was also asked what June did with the knife: “She just held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51165 - 2010-06-21
State v. Earl L. Diehl
answered yes. The court then engaged in a colloquy with Diehl with respect to each of the cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9624 - 2005-03-31
answered yes. The court then engaged in a colloquy with Diehl with respect to each of the cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9624 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
about … laterals from the main to the end of the right-of-way or to the lot line? A: Yes, sir. Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125491 - 2017-09-21
about … laterals from the main to the end of the right-of-way or to the lot line? A: Yes, sir. Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125491 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Earl L. Diehl
was "overall" their understanding of the plea agreement and each answered yes. The court then engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9625 - 2017-09-19
was "overall" their understanding of the plea agreement and each answered yes. The court then engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9625 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“yes” by the court because the State did not prove that answer by clear and convincing evidence; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165627 - 2017-09-21
“yes” by the court because the State did not prove that answer by clear and convincing evidence; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165627 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald D. Shampo
the charges and penalties, to which Shampo replied, “Yes.” ¶11 The court explained that a no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6071 - 2017-09-19
the charges and penalties, to which Shampo replied, “Yes.” ¶11 The court explained that a no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6071 - 2017-09-19