Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29301 - 29310 of 98489 for civil court case status online.

[PDF] State v. Emanuel P.
, this court concludes this is not an appropriate case for a new trial under § 752.35, STATS. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15635 - 2017-09-21

Jeff P. Brinckman v. Maura (Brinckman) Wehrenberg
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jeff Brinckman appeals two circuit court orders in this divorce case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6286 - 2005-03-31

Jeff P. Brinckman v. Maura (Brinckman) Wehrenberg
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jeff Brinckman appeals two circuit court orders in this divorce case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5546 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, information in the doctors’ reports, and the observations the court had made earlier in the case. Dehler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52989 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
signals. ¶12 As the trial court noted, throughout the pendency of his case, Irving indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85742 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
, pursuant to WIS. STAT. §§ 402.314 and 402.315.4 The case was tried to the court for seventeen days over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36537 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 25, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36913 - 2009-06-24

City of Sheboygan v. Mary Nell Matzdorf
notions of privacy. We conclude that it is. In Olson, the Court concluded that “[the defendant’s] status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12760 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dennis E. Jones
to the parties because a Racine County circuit court judge had been assigned to the case and Jones was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11775 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dennis E. Jones
. at 2 Jones’ case was handled by three different trial court judges. After judicial substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11775 - 2017-09-20