Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29301 - 29310 of 82986 for simple case.
Search results 29301 - 29310 of 82986 for simple case.
State v. Douglas Maug
and cause remanded with directions. SUNDBY, J. In this case, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7896 - 2005-03-31
and cause remanded with directions. SUNDBY, J. In this case, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7896 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. §§ 943.32(2) and 939.05. Three other related charges from the same case were dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1108300 - 2026-04-22
. STAT. §§ 943.32(2) and 939.05. Three other related charges from the same case were dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1108300 - 2026-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in Marathon County case No. 2015CF254. Several days before Strohkirch’s battery case was set to be tried
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207815 - 2018-01-30
in Marathon County case No. 2015CF254. Several days before Strohkirch’s battery case was set to be tried
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207815 - 2018-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case to determine if probable cause existed at the time of Kosmosky’s arrest. ¶7 An officer must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145595 - 2017-09-21
of this case to determine if probable cause existed at the time of Kosmosky’s arrest. ¶7 An officer must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145595 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eugene Nichols
sentence in a particular case. As a result, a judge imposing a sentence in one case cannot be bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10743 - 2005-03-31
sentence in a particular case. As a result, a judge imposing a sentence in one case cannot be bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10743 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848040 - 2024-09-10
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848040 - 2024-09-10
State v. Caran K. Zastrow
a secondary test, “in this case it could not be breath because of the injuries that she had sustained.”[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9538 - 2005-03-31
a secondary test, “in this case it could not be breath because of the injuries that she had sustained.”[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9538 - 2005-03-31
Carol L. Dodge v. James M. Schneider
the judgment of the circuit court. ¶2 This case involves a boundary dispute between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7250 - 2005-03-31
the judgment of the circuit court. ¶2 This case involves a boundary dispute between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7250 - 2005-03-31
Friebert v. Sophia Doucas
diligence under § 801.11, Stats., in serving Doucas in the underlying case. We conclude that the Friebert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14281 - 2005-03-31
diligence under § 801.11, Stats., in serving Doucas in the underlying case. We conclude that the Friebert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14281 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the particular case have reported to the prosecutor’s office.” Id., ¶24. It then concluded that the statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263130 - 2020-06-04
to the particular case have reported to the prosecutor’s office.” Id., ¶24. It then concluded that the statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263130 - 2020-06-04