Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29311 - 29320 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
., Lundsten and Sherman, JJ. Jeffry Schultz appeals an order that denied his motion to amend a 2004
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170316 - 2017-09-21

State v. Covan A. Gavitt
motion for substitution of Judge Howard was made in case 275. Because Gavitt had already substituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10195 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ronald L. Mikkelson
, JJ. PER CURIAM. Ronald Mikkelson appeals from an order denying his motion for a reduced sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14840 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
, P.J., Sherman, and Kloppenburg, JJ. Epsie Hinton appeals a circuit court order denying her motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144309 - 2015-07-07

COURT OF APPEALS
motion. The issue is whether he was entitled to a hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26673 - 2006-10-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Nos. 2017AP700-CRNM 2017AP701-CRNM 2017AP702-CRNM 2 postconviction motion or appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215262 - 2018-07-03

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat. ยง 974.06 (2003-04)[1] postconviction motion. Staples
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28006 - 2007-02-05

[PDF] State v. Jay L. Krueger
from an order denying his motion to correct the original judgments of conviction and from the amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17937 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ralph E. Beecher v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
, Defendants-Respondents-Petitioners. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2004 WI 88 Reported at: 273 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16637 - 2017-09-21

Clara C. Nelson v. City of Mauston
reverse. The trial court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7894 - 2005-03-31