Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29311 - 29320 of 30191 for de.

Joyce A. Devenport v. Paper Recycling Company
de novo, while benefiting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court of appeals. Sievert v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17493 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Nicole Schutte
, the interpretation of which presents a question of law we decide de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25635 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 103
interpretation and application present questions No. 2009AP1557 15 of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75718 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 62
2020 WI 62 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN NOTICE This order is subject to further edit...
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266687 - 2020-06-30

[PDF] Frontsheet
is a question of law we review de novo. Fleming, 131 Wis. 2d at 127. Understanding this issue requires
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664263 - 2023-06-02

State v. Nicole Schutte
presents a question of law we decide de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25635 - 2006-07-25

[PDF] State v. Charles C. Downing
review de novo. State v. Eichman, 155 Wis. 2d 552, 560, 455 N.W.2d 143 (1990). The purpose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17111 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
a straightforward issue of statutory interpretation that we review de novo." Backus v. Waukesha Cnty., 2022 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668466 - 2023-06-14

[PDF] Joseph Finnegan v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
interpretation, subject to de novo appellate review. Czapinski v. St. Francis Hosp., 2000 WI 80, ΒΆ12, 236 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16559 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gino M. Alia
, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21277 - 2017-09-21