Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29331 - 29340 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 29331 - 29340 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Williams
the order denying his postconviction motion and motion to reconsider. Williams argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11239 - 2017-09-19
the order denying his postconviction motion and motion to reconsider. Williams argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11239 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of four charges. Jackson also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268986 - 2020-07-14
of four charges. Jackson also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268986 - 2020-07-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
CURIAM. Larry B. Hooker appeals from a postconviction order summarily denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29133 - 2014-09-15
CURIAM. Larry B. Hooker appeals from a postconviction order summarily denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29133 - 2014-09-15
State v. Andrew B. Lamont
objected to the motion. The court applied the factors established in Elam v. State, 50 Wis.2d 383, 184 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12769 - 2005-03-31
objected to the motion. The court applied the factors established in Elam v. State, 50 Wis.2d 383, 184 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12769 - 2005-03-31
State v. Vernon Dansand
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. We affirm. As a preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13766 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. We affirm. As a preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13766 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Arthur P. Gamroth v. Village of Jackson
administration, we construe Arthur P. Gamroth’s action before us to be an appeal of a denial of a motion under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11756 - 2017-09-20
administration, we construe Arthur P. Gamroth’s action before us to be an appeal of a denial of a motion under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11756 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion with the affidavit of Keith Manson. The affidavit reflects that Manson is authorized to act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137500 - 2017-09-21
the motion with the affidavit of Keith Manson. The affidavit reflects that Manson is authorized to act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137500 - 2017-09-21
Arthur P. Gamroth v. Village of Jackson
. Gamroth’s action before us to be an appeal of a denial of a motion under either one or all of § 806.07(1)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11756 - 2005-03-31
. Gamroth’s action before us to be an appeal of a denial of a motion under either one or all of § 806.07(1)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11756 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion for relief. Natcone argues that he must be permitted to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010211 - 2025-09-18
denying his postconviction motion for relief. Natcone argues that he must be permitted to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010211 - 2025-09-18
State v. Loren L. Leiser
court erred when, without a hearing, it denied his postconviction motion claiming ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2108 - 2005-03-31
court erred when, without a hearing, it denied his postconviction motion claiming ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2108 - 2005-03-31