Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29341 - 29350 of 38498 for ph d.
Search results 29341 - 29350 of 38498 for ph d.
[PDF]
Wood County Department of Human Services v. Denise F. R.
court for Wood County: DENNIS D. CONWAY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DYKMAN, J. 1 Denise F.R. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4816 - 2017-09-19
court for Wood County: DENNIS D. CONWAY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DYKMAN, J. 1 Denise F.R. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4816 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of enforcement, alleging “[m]alfeasance by the DA’s office for failure to mitigate [d]amages.” He also filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45663 - 2010-01-12
of enforcement, alleging “[m]alfeasance by the DA’s office for failure to mitigate [d]amages.” He also filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45663 - 2010-01-12
2006 WI APP 239
and voluntary consent under the Fourth Amendment. See United States v. Elliott, 210 F.Supp. 357, 360 (D. Mass
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26859 - 2006-11-20
and voluntary consent under the Fourth Amendment. See United States v. Elliott, 210 F.Supp. 357, 360 (D. Mass
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26859 - 2006-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
on to explain that number five resembled the shooter in “body shape, body size, height, physical buil[d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141465 - 2015-05-11
on to explain that number five resembled the shooter in “body shape, body size, height, physical buil[d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141465 - 2015-05-11
[PDF]
State v. Joseph White
, the court told the jury to "[d]isregard all stricken testimony." We must presume that the jury will follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8314 - 2017-09-19
, the court told the jury to "[d]isregard all stricken testimony." We must presume that the jury will follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8314 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
(1)(d)-(1)(e), does a disservice to their clients, and seriously hampers our ability to efficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42361 - 2009-10-19
(1)(d)-(1)(e), does a disservice to their clients, and seriously hampers our ability to efficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42361 - 2009-10-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Woller also contends the court “never addresse[d] the credibility of the witnesses,” suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236008 - 2019-02-26
. Woller also contends the court “never addresse[d] the credibility of the witnesses,” suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236008 - 2019-02-26
[PDF]
WI APP 6
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Steven D. Grunder, assistant state public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131811 - 2017-09-21
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Steven D. Grunder, assistant state public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131811 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 08, 2005 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
Gahagan’s testimony, but such a finding is implied. The trial court noted that Gahagan “allege[d]” that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20173 - 2007-01-24
Gahagan’s testimony, but such a finding is implied. The trial court noted that Gahagan “allege[d]” that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20173 - 2007-01-24
State v. James P. Sullivan
thereafter.” Section 343.305(9)(d). A revocation is effective “immediately upon a final determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12789 - 2005-03-31
thereafter.” Section 343.305(9)(d). A revocation is effective “immediately upon a final determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12789 - 2005-03-31