Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29351 - 29360 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 29351 - 29360 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
count of manufacturing or delivery of THC, as well as an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32389 - 2008-04-07
count of manufacturing or delivery of THC, as well as an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32389 - 2008-04-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
, convicting him of one count of manufacturing or delivery of THC, as well as an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32389 - 2014-09-15
, convicting him of one count of manufacturing or delivery of THC, as well as an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32389 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Donald Young appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying a motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68534 - 2011-07-25
PER CURIAM. Donald Young appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying a motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68534 - 2011-07-25
Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
and denying their motion for reconsideration.[1] The Lucarelis argue that the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31
and denying their motion for reconsideration.[1] The Lucarelis argue that the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Larry C. Olson v. Charles H. Thompson
. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 9, 546 N.W.2d 151, 155 (1996). The trial court denied their motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11517 - 2017-09-19
. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 9, 546 N.W.2d 151, 155 (1996). The trial court denied their motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11517 - 2017-09-19
State v. Demetrius Newman
the motion under advisement. The State renewed this request before closing argument as the court had not yet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13946 - 2005-03-31
the motion under advisement. The State renewed this request before closing argument as the court had not yet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13946 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
briefing by the parties, the circuit court granted the Credit Union’s motion for summary judgment in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
briefing by the parties, the circuit court granted the Credit Union’s motion for summary judgment in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
convictions. Apparently the circuit court granted the motion.[2] On direct examination by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35733 - 2009-03-04
convictions. Apparently the circuit court granted the motion.[2] On direct examination by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35733 - 2009-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
home, and an order denying her motion for reconsideration. She contends that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39034 - 2009-08-05
home, and an order denying her motion for reconsideration. She contends that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39034 - 2009-08-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
briefing by the parties, the circuit court granted the Credit Union’s motion for summary judgment in its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
briefing by the parties, the circuit court granted the Credit Union’s motion for summary judgment in its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13