Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29381 - 29390 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 29381 - 29390 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. David C. Taylor
to Wis. Stat. § 948.025(1)[1] and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Taylor contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4885 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. § 948.025(1)[1] and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Taylor contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4885 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
convictions. Apparently the circuit court granted the motion.2 On direct examination by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35733 - 2014-09-15
convictions. Apparently the circuit court granted the motion.2 On direct examination by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35733 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of heroin. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50218 - 2014-09-15
of heroin. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50218 - 2014-09-15
State v. Levi Booth
his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that the trial court erred in failing to conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4234 - 2005-03-31
his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that the trial court erred in failing to conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4234 - 2005-03-31
Peter L. Steinberg v. Mark G. Sukowaty
for the requisite twenty years and that the trial court erred in not granting his motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11788 - 2005-03-31
for the requisite twenty years and that the trial court erred in not granting his motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11788 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey J. Rittenhouse
SNYDER, J.[1] Jeffrey J. Rittenhouse appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. He seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3385 - 2005-03-31
SNYDER, J.[1] Jeffrey J. Rittenhouse appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. He seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3385 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his postconviction motion. Boyd argues on appeal that his constitutional protection against double
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137625 - 2017-09-21
his postconviction motion. Boyd argues on appeal that his constitutional protection against double
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137625 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in imposing the maximum available period for reconfinement. The trial court summarily denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52530 - 2010-07-26
in imposing the maximum available period for reconfinement. The trial court summarily denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52530 - 2010-07-26
State v. Knova K. Green
. §§ 961.16(2)(b)1 and 961.41(1m)(cm)1, and the order denying his postconviction motion seeking to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3098 - 2005-03-31
. §§ 961.16(2)(b)1 and 961.41(1m)(cm)1, and the order denying his postconviction motion seeking to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3098 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David C. Taylor
-CR 2 WIS. STAT. § 948.025(1) 1 and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4885 - 2017-09-19
-CR 2 WIS. STAT. § 948.025(1) 1 and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4885 - 2017-09-19